Literature DB >> 8680998

The predictors of surgical procedure and the effects on functional recovery in elderly with subcapital fractures.

Y Young1, P German, L Brant, J Kenzora, J Magaziner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that the majority of hip fracture patients do not regain their prefracture level of functioning and usually decline in function following fracture. Little is known about the effectiveness of surgical procedure performed (hemiarthroplasty vs internal fixation) on functional recovery of subcapital fracture patients. This study examines the factors related to the type of the surgical procedure chosen and the effect of this selection on physical activities of daily living (PADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).
METHODS: The sample consists of 312 patients with subcapital fractures age 65 and older admitted from the community to one of seven Baltimore area hospitals between 1984 and 1986. Baseline information was obtained during hospitalization through structured interviews with both patients and their significant others (proxy). The follow-up interviews were administered to proxies at two months, six months, and one year after discharge from hospital. Information on disease diagnoses, fracture severity, and surgical procedures performed was obtained from medical charts.
RESULTS: Patients with a displaced fracture were seven times more likely to receive a hemiarthroplasty (OR = 7.0, 95% CI 3.7-13.1). During the short-term recovery (2 months after surgery), patients who received hemiarthroplasty were doing better in transferring, meal preparation, and shopping than those who received internal fixation. For the long-term functional recovery (one year), the overall PADL and IADL functions were not statistically significantly different between the two surgical procedures performed.
CONCLUSIONS: The severity of fracture was found to be the most important determinant of surgical procedure. Patients with a subcapital fracture who received hemiarthroplasty tended to have a better functional recovery in the short term. Further study of other benefits of using as hemiarthroplasty is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8680998     DOI: 10.1093/gerona/51a.4.m158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci        ISSN: 1079-5006            Impact factor:   6.053


  6 in total

1.  Exploring older adults' patterns and perceptions of exercise after hip fracture.

Authors:  Erin Gorman; Anna M Chudyk; Christiane A Hoppmann; Heather M Hanson; Pierre Guy; Joanie Sims-Gould; Maureen C Ashe
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Examining heterogeneity of functional recovery among older adults with hip fractures.

Authors:  Yuchi Young; Kuangnan Xiong; Robert M Pruzek; Larry J Brant
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.669

3.  Predictors of gait speed in patients after hip fracture.

Authors:  Kathleen Kline Mangione; Rebecca L Craik; Rosalie Lopopolo; James D Tomlinson; Susan K Brenneman
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options.

Authors:  George Mouzopoulos; Michalis Stamatakos; Helen Arabatzi; George Vasiliadis; George Batanis; Anastasia Tsembeli; Mathaios Tzurbakis; Michalis Safioleas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Don't worry, be positive: improving functional recovery 1 year after hip fracture.

Authors:  Yuchi Young; Barbara Resnick
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.625

6.  Functional comparison between uncemented Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty and osteosynthesis with three screws in displaced femoral neck fractures--a matched-pair study of 168 patients.

Authors:  Juha Partanen; Pekka Jalovaara
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 3.075

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.