Literature DB >> 17431621

The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options.

George Mouzopoulos1, Michalis Stamatakos, Helen Arabatzi, George Vasiliadis, George Batanis, Anastasia Tsembeli, Mathaios Tzurbakis, Michalis Safioleas.   

Abstract

According to the literature, hip function after hip fracture is affected by the type of surgery. Our aim was to determine the correlation between surgical treatment of hip fracture and postoperative function in the elderly. Inclusion criteria were displaced hip fracture and age over 70 years. One hundred and twenty-nine participants were randomly divided into three groups according to the type of the surgical operation they underwent (hemi-arthroplasty [Merete, Berlin, Germany], total arthroplasty [Plus; De Puy, Warsaw, IN, USA] and internal fixation [Richards plate screw; Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA]). The function of the patients was estimated using the following parameters: the Barthel Index and Harris Hip Score, the range of passive hip motion, the gait speed of individuals, after 1 and 4 years of follow-up. The Barthel Index scores after 4 years of follow-up were 85.3, 82.6, 80.1 after total arthroplasty, hemi-arthroplasty and internal fixation respectively. Similarly, the Harris Hip Scores after 4 years of follow-up were 83.7, 79.5 and 73.6. The range of passive hip motion in the three groups of patients did not differ significantly (p>0.05). Also, patients of the total arthroplasty and hemi-arthroplasty groups walked faster than the patients of the internal fixation group 4 years after discharge (p<0.05). In conclusion, we believe that total hip arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for displaced subcapital hip fractures in patients over 70 years old.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17431621      PMCID: PMC2323425          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0321-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  26 in total

1.  Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur--13 year results of a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  K J Ravikumar; G Marsh
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Hip Fractures: I. Overview and Evaluation and Treatment of Femoral-Neck Fractures.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Predictors of functional recovery after hip fracture in the elderly.

Authors:  K J Koval; M L Skovron; G B Aharonoff; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: the importance of psychosocial factors.

Authors:  J M Mossey; E Mutran; K Knott; R Craik
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports.

Authors:  G L Lu-Yao; R B Keller; B Littenberg; J E Wennberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Hip fracture mortality and morbidity--can we do better?

Authors:  C W Davidson; M J Merrilees; T J Wilkinson; J S McKie; N L Gilchrist
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2001-07-27

7.  Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial of 208 patients.

Authors:  M J Parker; G A Pryor
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-10

8.  Recovery of function after hip fracture. The role of social supports.

Authors:  S R Cummings; S L Phillips; M E Wheat; D Black; E Goosby; D Wlodarczyk; P Trafton; H Jergesen; C H Winograd; S B Hulley
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  The predictors of surgical procedure and the effects on functional recovery in elderly with subcapital fractures.

Authors:  Y Young; P German; L Brant; J Kenzora; J Magaziner
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.053

10.  Hip fractures in Hungary and Sweden - differences in treatment and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Péter Cserháti; Károly Fekete; Margaretha Berglund-Rödén; Hans Wingstrand; Karl-Göran Thorngren
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Arthroplasty options in femoral-neck fracture: answers from the national registries.

Authors:  Arun Kannan; Ramprasad Kancherla; Stephen McMahon; Gabrielle Hawdon; Aditya Soral; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comment on Mouzopoulos et al.: The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options.

Authors:  A R Nataraj; Deepak Singhal; Chandrashekar Yadav; Vijay Sharma
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Ligang Yu; Yan Wang; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture.

Authors:  Andres Rodriguez-Buitrago; Basem Attum; Cesar Cereijo; Kurt Yusi; A Alex Jahangir; William T Obremskey
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-04-10

5.  Medium-term patient-reported outcomes after total hip replacement for displaced hip fractures.

Authors:  Scott D Middleton; Neil McNiven; Raymond E Anakwe; Paul J Jenkins; Stuart A Aitken; John F Keating; Matthew Moran
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-25

Review 6.  Does Arthroplasty Provide Better Outcomes Than Internal Fixation At Mid- and Long-term Followup? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Jiang; Chen-hui Yang; Qiao Lin; Xiang-dong Yun; Ya-yi Xia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Functional outcomes and perceived quality of life following fixation of femoral neck fractures in adults from 18 to 69 years using dynamic hip screw (DHS) and an additional anti-rotation screw- a retrospective analysis of 53 patients after a mean follow-up time of 4 years.

Authors:  Anne Fjeld; Tim Fülling; Philipp Bula; Felix Bonnaire
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Carmelo D'Arrigo; Dario Perugia; Alessandro Carcangiu; Edoardo Monaco; Attilio Speranza; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Efficacies of surgical treatments based on Harris hip score in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Chengwei Liang; Fengjian Yang; Weilong Lin; Yongqian Fan
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

10.  Letter to the Editor regarding "Hemiarthroplasty compared to total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis".

Authors:  Qiujiang Li; Xingxia Long; Yinbin Wang; Xiaocheng Jiang; Lijun Cai
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.