Literature DB >> 8678385

Effectiveness and safety of intranasal ipratropium bromide in common colds. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

F G Hayden1, L Diamond, P B Wood, D C Korts, M T Wecker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the tolerability and clinical effectiveness of intranasal ipratropium bromide for the treatment of symptoms of common colds.
DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial.
SETTING: 3 university student health services. PATIENTS: 411 previously healthy persons 14 to 56 years of age who had cold symptoms that had lasted for no more than 36 hours, rhinorrhea subjectively judged to be of at least moderate severity, and documented nasal discharge of at least 1.5 g over a 1-hour observation period. INTERVENTION: Either 1) ipratropium bromide nasal spray 0.06% in buffered salt solution, two 42-micrograms sprays per nostril administered by metered pump spray; 2) control nasal spray, which consisted of buffered salt solution; or 3) no treatment. Treatments were self-administered three or four times daily during waking hours for 4 days. After receiving their morning dose, patients stayed at the study center for 6 hours on study day 1 and 3 hours on study day 2; symptom severity was recorded and nasal mucus discharges were collected and weighed hourly during these periods.
RESULTS: Ipratropium recipients had 26% less nasal discharge than controls (P = 0.0024) and 34% less nasal discharge than untreated patients (P = 0.0001). Severity of rhinorrhea as judged subjectively was reduced in ipratropium recipients by 31% compared with controls and by 78% compared with untreated patients (P = 0.0001 for both comparisons). In addition to being associated with reductions in daily assessments of the severity of rhinorrhea (P < or = 0.003), ipratropium was associated with reduced sneezing on study days 2 (20% difference; P = 0.03) and 4 (30% difference; P = 0.02) but not with reduced nasal congestion compared with the control spray. Ipratropium was generally well tolerated but was associated with higher rates of blood-tinged mucus (16.8% in the ipratropium group compared with 3.6% in the control group; P = 0.01) and nasal dryness (11.7% in the ipratropium group compared with 3.6% in the control group; P = 0.021) than the control spray. Patient assessments of the overall effectiveness of treatment were more favorable for ipratropium than for the control spray (P < or = 0.026) or for no treatment (P < or = 0.002) on each day of inquiry (study days 1, 2, and 5).
CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal ipratropium bromide provides specific relief of rhinorrhea and sneezing associated with common colds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8678385     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-2-199607150-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  21 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of the common cold.

Authors:  S B Mossad
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-04

Review 2.  Problems and prospects of developing effective therapy for common cold viruses.

Authors:  S L Johnston
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 3.  Current and Future Treatments of Rhinitis and Sinusitis.

Authors:  Gayatri B Patel; Robert C Kern; Jonathan A Bernstein; Park Hae-Sim; Anju T Peters
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-01-28

Review 4.  Association of rhinovirus infections with asthma.

Authors:  J E Gern; W W Busse
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions.

Authors:  Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 6.  Intranasal ipratropium bromide for the common cold.

Authors:  Zaina H AlBalawi; Sahar S Othman; Khalid Alfaleh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-19

Review 7.  Evidence for placebo effects on physical but not on biochemical outcome parameters: a review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Karin Meissner; Hans Distel; Ulla Mitzdorf
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Autonomic nervous system dysfunction and sinonasal symptoms.

Authors:  Alexander Yao; Janet A Wilson; Stephen L Ball
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2018-04-16

9.  Anticholinergic drugs in nonallergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Robert Naclerio
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 4.084

Review 10.  Community acquired respiratory virus infections in cancer patients-Guideline on diagnosis and management by the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society for haematology and Medical Oncology.

Authors:  Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal; Annemarie Berger; Maximilian Christopeit; Marcus Hentrich; Claus Peter Heussel; Jana Kalkreuth; Michael Klein; Matthias Kochanek; Olaf Penack; Elke Hauf; Christina Rieger; Gerda Silling; Maria Vehreschild; Thomas Weber; Hans-Heinrich Wolf; Nicola Lehners; Enrico Schalk; Karin Mayer
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 9.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.