Literature DB >> 8678248

A comparison of the stress response to laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade.

E P McCoy1, R K Mirakhur, B V McCloskey.   

Abstract

The cardiovascular changes and catecholamine concentrations were compared in 20 patients before and after laryngoscopy with either the Macintosh or the McCoy laryngoscope blades. Following induction with fentanyl and thiopentone and muscle relaxation with vecuronium the vocal cords were visualised for 10 s with either the Macintosh or McCoy blade, chosen at random. Heart rate, arterial blood pressure and plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline concentrations were measured before, and at, laryngoscopy, and 1, 3 and 5 min later. There was a significant increase in both heart rate (33%) and arterial blood pressure (27%) after laryngoscopy using the Macintosh blade (p < 0.01). Use of the McCoy blade did not result in any significant change in either heart rate or arterial blood pressure. There was a slight increase (p > 0.05) in plasma noradrenaline concentrations using the Macintosh blade which persisted for 5 min after laryngoscopy. This was not observed with the McCoy blade. There was no change in plasma adrenaline concentrations with either blade during the 5 min after laryngoscopy when compared to the values before laryngoscopy. It is concluded that the stress response to laryngoscopy is less marked with the use of the McCoy blade and is probably due to a reduction in the force necessary to obtain a clear view of the larynx.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8678248     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb05924.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of various airway devices on hemodynamic response and QTc interval in rabbits under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Huseyin Toman; Mesut Erbas; Hasan Sahin; Hasan Ali Kiraz; Metehan Uzun; Mehmet Akif Ovali
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The learning curve for laryngoscopy: Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscopes.

Authors:  Marco Baciarello; Michele Zasa; Maria Elena Manferdini; Michela Tosi; Marco Berti; Guido Fanelli
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  The pressure exerted on the tongue during intubation with simultaneous cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between four videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope-a manikin study.

Authors:  Dawid Aleksandrowicz; Tomasz Gaszyński
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Haemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation in coronary artery disease: Direct versus video laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Muralidhar Kanchi; Hema C Nair; Sanjay Banakal; Keshava Murthy; C Murugesan
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-05

5.  Is I-gel airway a better option to endotracheal tube airway for sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia during cardiac surgery?

Authors:  Ahmed Said Elgebaly; Ahmed Ali Eldabaa
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2014 May-Aug

6.  Effect of the McGRATH MAC® Video Laryngoscope on Hemodynamic Response during Tracheal Intubation: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Masashi Yokose; Takahiro Mihara; Sayoko Kuwahara; Takahisa Goto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Haemodynamic Response to Four Different Laryngoscopes.

Authors:  Demet Altun; Achmet Ali; Emre Çamcı; Anıl Özonur; Tülay Özkan Seyhan
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-09-06

8.  The Pentax airway scope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope: Comparison of hemodynamic responses and concentrations of plasma norepinephrine to tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Heeseung Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-04-22

9.  Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes.

Authors:  Mehtab A Haidry; Fauzia A Khan
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04

10.  Comparative effectiveness of McCoy laryngoscope and CMAC(®) videolaryngoscope in simulated cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  Divya Jain; Indu Bala; Komal Gandhi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.