Literature DB >> 8678138

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

N M Spirtos1, J B Schlaerth, R E Kimball, V M Leiphart, S C Ballon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to incorporate a wide range of operative laparoscopic techniques to complete a type III radical hysterectomy with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: A type III radical hysterectomy with bilateral aortic and pelvic lymph node dissection was separated into eight component parts: (1) right and left aortic lymphadenectomy, (2) right and left pelvic lymphadenectomy, (3) development of the paravesical and pararectal spaces, (4) ureteral dissection, (5) ligation and dissection of the uterine artery, (6) development of the vesicouterine and rectovaginal spaces, (7) resection of the parametria, and (8) resection of the upper vagina. The adequacy of the component parts was determined and documented on video.
RESULTS: Complete aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy and a type III radical hysterectomy were performed by operative laparoscopy. Argon beam coagulation and countertraction facilitated pelvic and aortic lymph node dissection, including removal of nodal tissue lateral to the iliac vessels. Ureteral dissection with resection of the cervicovesical fascia ("the tunnel") was completed with right-angle dissectors, vascular clips, and argon-beam coagulation. Resection of the cardinal and ureterosacral ligaments was successful by use of Endo-GIA stapling instruments (United States Surgical Corporation, Norwalk, Ct.).
CONCLUSION: A complete pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy and type III radical hysterectomy were performed laparoscopically. This approach could potentially decrease morbidity historically associated with radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy performed either abdominally or vaginally. Only prospective randomized trails will allow for the evaluation of potential benefits associated with this surgical technique.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8678138     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70208-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  12 in total

1.  Quality of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in developing countries: a comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between a comprehensive cancer center in the United States and a cancer center in Colombia.

Authors:  Rene Pareja; Alpa M Nick; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael Frumovitz; Pamela T Soliman; Carlos A Buitrago; Mauricio Borrero; Gonzalo Angel; Ricardo Dos Reis; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Comparison of outcomes between laparotomy and robotic technique for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ahmet Göçmen; Fatih Şanlıkan; Mustafa Gazi Uçar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-06-27

Review 3.  Innovative laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Siobhan M Kehoe; Pedro T Ramirez; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  A comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  M Patrick Lowe; Anna V Hoekstra; Arati Jairam-Thodla; Diljeet K Singh; Barbara M Buttin; John R Lurain; Julian C Schink
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-02-27

5.  Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures.

Authors:  H Xu; Y Chen; Y Li; Q Zhang; D Wang; Z Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Survival after Laparoscopic versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Luciana Silveira Campos; Leo Francisco Limberger; Airton Teltebom Stein; Jose Manuel Caldas
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 7.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Siobhan M Kehoe; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-03

8.  Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

Authors:  Sarah E Taylor; William C McBee; Scott D Richard; Robert P Edwards
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Luciana Silveira Campos; Leo Francisco Limberger; Airton Tetelbom Stein; Antonio Nocchi Kalil
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ali Kucukmetin; Ioannis Biliatis; Raj Naik; Andrew Bryant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.