Literature DB >> 8675440

Mobile technology in rural hospitals: the case of the CT scanner.

D Hartley1, I Moscovice, J Christianson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the relationship between hospital and regional characteristics and the prevalence of mobile computed tomography in rural hospitals. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY
SETTING: Primary data were gathered from all rural hospitals in eight northwestern states (n = 471) in 1991. Secondary data sources include the AHA Annual Survey, the Area Resource File, and HCFA's PPS data sets for 1987-1990. STUDY
DESIGN: Primary data are a single observation taken in the summer of 1991. Key hospital characteristics include patient volume, distance to the nearest referral center, distance to the nearest hospital, financial performance, and medical staff size. Key regional variables include beds per unit area, hospitals per unit area, and physician supply. DATA COLLECTION: A structured telephone interview was conducted with the hospital administrator at each hospital. For many hospitals, detailed information was gathered with additional calls to hospital personnel. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Where hospitals are closely spaced, mobile CT suppliers are more readily available, and hospitals are more likely to choose mobile CT than in areas where hospitals are farther apart. Hospitals may realize economies of scale and scope in their decisions about CT adoption.
CONCLUSIONS: Transportation costs are an important determinant of hospital decisions about acquiring CT, but may be less important for higher-priced medical technologies. There is no support for the proposition that rural hospitals compete with referral centers for patients by purchasing technological equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8675440      PMCID: PMC1070114     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  8 in total

1.  The comparative retention of National Health Service Corps and other rural physicians. Results of a 9-year follow-up study.

Authors:  D E Pathman; T R Konrad; T C Ricketts
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Rural hospitals: a literature synthesis and health services research agenda.

Authors:  I S Moscovice
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Technology-driven referrals, a fundamental problem for small rural hospitals.

Authors:  K A Bateman
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Hospital adoption of medical technology: an empirical test of alternative models.

Authors:  J D Teplensky; M V Pauly; J R Kimberly; A L Hillman; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The role of specialized clinical services in competition among hospitals.

Authors:  H S Luft; J C Robinson; D W Garnick; S C Maerki; S J McPhee
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  What governs the decision to contract out for local hospital services?

Authors:  J M Ferris; E Graddy
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.730

7.  The adoption and diffusion of CT and MRI in the United States. A comparative analysis.

Authors:  A L Hillman; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Determinants of rural travel distance for obstetrics care.

Authors:  J M Bronstein; M A Morrisey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.983

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The lack of effect of market structure on hospice use.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; Virginia W Chang; James X Zhang; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Racial, ethnic, and affluence differences in elderly patients' use of teaching hospitals.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; Farr A Curlin; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.128

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.