Literature DB >> 1518110

The comparative retention of National Health Service Corps and other rural physicians. Results of a 9-year follow-up study.

D E Pathman1, T R Konrad, T C Ricketts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To contrast the retention of physicians serving National Health Service Corps (NHSC) Scholarship Program obligations in rural settings to that of non-NHSC physicians working in the same or similar practices, and to identify promising retention-enhancing strategies.
DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred twelve primary care physicians initially identified during an earlier study as working in a national stratified random sample of 178 externally subsidized rural clinics in 1981. Thirty-six percent were serving obligations to the NHSC, nearly all through the NHSC's Scholarship Program. The NHSC and non-NHSC inception cohorts (those first coming to their 1981 [or "index"] practices from May 1979 through December 1981) were created from within the entire group for use in most analyses. INTERVENTION: In 1990, physicians were resurveyed to learn of their backgrounds, experiences in their index practices, and their subsequent career moves.
RESULTS: By 1984 and in each year thereafter, fewer NHSC than non-NHSC physicians of the entire respondent cohort remained (1) in their index practices, (2) in their index communities, and (3) in practice in any rural county (P less than .001). In the inception cohort, fewer NHSC than non-NHSC physicians were retained within all three settings by the third year after their initial dates of employment (P less than or equal to .01). After 8 years of employment, group retention rates for NHSC and non-NHSC inception cohort physicians were 12% vs 39% in the index practice and 29% vs 52% in nonmetropolitan practice. Physicians in both NHSC and non-NHSC groups who left their index practices generally left rural practice altogether.
CONCLUSIONS: When compared to non-NHSC physicians working in comparable rural settings, the retention of rural NHSC physicians is seen to be poor and only partially explained by fixed physician, practice, or community variables. Long-term retention of NHSC providers is now receiving much needed attention at the federal level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1518110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  22 in total

1.  Recruitment and retention in the Navajo Area Indian Health Service.

Authors:  C Kim
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-10

2.  Retention of primary care physicians in rural health professional shortage areas.

Authors:  Donald E Pathman; Thomas R Konrad; Rebekkah Dann; Gary Koch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Job location decisions of pharmacy graduates in British Columbia.

Authors:  Marion L Pearson; Lesley Andres
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Workforce issues in rural areas: a focus on policy equity.

Authors:  Thomas C Ricketts
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Increasing the number of rural physicians.

Authors:  James Rourke
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  [The decentralized training program and the retention of general practitioners in Quebec's Lower St. Lawrence Region].

Authors:  Ray Bustinza; Suzanne Gagnon; Guillaume Burigusa
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Interventions for increasing the proportion of health professionals practising in rural and other underserved areas.

Authors:  Liesl Grobler; Ben J Marais; Sikhumbuzo Mabunda
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-30

8.  Health Center Professional Programs and Primary Care Workforce.

Authors:  Jaya Aysola; DaShawn Groves; LeRoi S Hicks
Journal:  J Fam Med Community Health       Date:  2015-12-05

9.  Physician decision making for colorectal cancer screening in the elderly.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Denise Esserman; Christopher DeLeon; Michael P Pignone; Donald E Pathman; Carol Golin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Financial incentives for return of service in underserved areas: a systematic review.

Authors:  Till Bärnighausen; David E Bloom
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.