Literature DB >> 8674067

Genetic alterations in untreated metastases and androgen-independent prostate cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization and allelotyping.

M L Cher1, G S Bova, D H Moore, E J Small, P R Carroll, S S Pin, J I Epstein, W B Isaacs, R H Jensen.   

Abstract

A newly developed method of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) employing quantitative statistical comparisons was applied to DNA from two different types of advanced prostate cancer tissue. Multiple CGH analyses were obtained for each chromosome in each tumor, and the results of point-by-point comparison of the mean tumor:normal color ratio to a control normal:normal color ratio in each of 1247 evenly distributed data channels constituting the entire human genome were interpreted as loss, gain, or no change in copy number in the tumor genome. Group I tissue was obtained from prostate cancer metastases from 20 patients, 19 of whom had received no prior prostate cancer treatment. This DNA also was analyzed by Southern and microsatellite allelotyping at 53 different loci on 20 different chromosome arms. CGH results agreed with allelotyping results at 92% of the informative loci studied. These samples, which contained highly enriched tumor DNA, showed the highest rates of alteration yet reported in several chromosomal regions known to be altered frequently in prostate cancer: 8q gain (85%), 8p loss (80%), 13q loss (75%), 16q loss (55%), 17p loss (50%), and 10q loss (50%). Group II tissue was obtained predominately from primary or recurrent tumor from 11 patients who had been treated with long-term androgen-deprivation therapy and developed androgen-independent metastatic disease. Quantitative CGH analysis on DNA from these tissues showed chromosomal alterations that were very similar to those found in group I, suggesting that untreated metastatic tumors contain the bulk of chromosomal alterations necessary for recurrence to occur during androgen deprivation. In the entire data set, a number of previously undetected regions of frequent loss or gain were identified, including losses of chromosomes 2q (42%), 5q (39%), 6q (39%), and 15q (39%) and gains of chromosomes 11p (52%), 1q (52%), 3q (52%), and 2p (45%). Chi-squared analysis showed a significantly higher frequency of gain of the 4q25-q28 region in tumors from African-American patients, indicating a possible oncogene whose activation may play a role in the higher rate of progression seen in this ethnic group. Additional study of these frequently altered regions may provide insight into the mechanism of prostate cancer progression and lead to important tools for tumor-specific prognosis and therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8674067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  57 in total

1.  A genome screen of families with multiple cases of prostate cancer: evidence of genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  C L Hsieh; I Oakley-Girvan; R R Balise; J Halpern; R P Gallagher; A H Wu; L N Kolonel; L E O'Brien; I G Lin; D J Van Den Berg; C Z Teh; D W West; A S Whittemore
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Krüppel cripples prostate cancer: KLF6 progress and prospects.

Authors:  Goutham Narla; Scott L Friedman; John A Martignetti
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Evidence for a rare prostate cancer-susceptibility locus at chromosome 1p36.

Authors:  M Gibbs; J L Stanford; R A McIndoe; G P Jarvik; S Kolb; E L Goode; L Chakrabarti; E F Schuster; V A Buckley; E L Miller; S Brandzel; S Li; L Hood; E A Ostrander
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Consolidation of the cancer genome into domains of repressive chromatin by long-range epigenetic silencing (LRES) reduces transcriptional plasticity.

Authors:  Marcel W Coolen; Clare Stirzaker; Jenny Z Song; Aaron L Statham; Zena Kassir; Carlos S Moreno; Andrew N Young; Vijay Varma; Terence P Speed; Mark Cowley; Paul Lacaze; Warren Kaplan; Mark D Robinson; Susan J Clark
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  The impact of genomic alterations on the transcriptome: a prostate cancer cell line case study.

Authors:  J Chaudhary; M Schmidt
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Gene expression profiles in the PC-3 human prostate cancer cells induced by NKX3.1.

Authors:  Pengju Zhang; Wenwen Liu; Ju Zhang; Hengyun Guan; Weiwen Chen; Xing Cui; Qingwei Liu; Anli Jiang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Identification of Sp1-elements in the promoter region of human homeobox gene NKX3.1.

Authors:  Chun-Xiao Yu; Tong Jin; Wei-Wen Chen; Peng-Ju Zhang; Wen-Wen Liu; Heng-Yun Guan; Ju Zhang; Qing-Wei Liu; An-Li Jiang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Human RecQL4 helicase plays critical roles in prostate carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Yanrong Su; Jarah A Meador; Gloria M Calaf; Luca Proietti De-Santis; Yongliang Zhao; Vilhelm A Bohr; Adayabalam S Balajee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  A role for the putative tumor suppressor Bin1 in muscle cell differentiation.

Authors:  R J Wechsler-Reya; K J Elliott; G C Prendergast
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Regulation of SRC kinases by microRNA-3607 located in a frequently deleted locus in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sharanjot Saini; Shahana Majid; Varahram Shahryari; Z Laura Tabatabai; Sumit Arora; Soichiro Yamamura; Yuichiro Tanaka; Rajvir Dahiya; Guoren Deng
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 6.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.