P A di Sant'Agnese1, A T Cockett. 1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prostatic neuroendocrine cell is a regulatory cell that produces serotonin and peptide hormones. This cell is part of a more widely dispersed diffuse neuroendocrine regulatory system known as the APUD system. Focal neuroendocrine differentiation is seen in virtually all prostate carcinomas to one degree or another. Specific malignancies that are purely neuroendocrine include small cell carcinoma and carcinoid/carcinoid-like tumors. A variety of studies suggest a possible prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma. METHODS: The literature on the prostatic neuroendocrine cell and neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma is reviewed. RESULTS: Based on analogy with other better studied elements of the diffuse neuroendocrine regulatory system or APUD system, as well as the morphology and specific products produced by neuroendocrine cells, it is likely that they play an important regulatory role in the prostate. Neuroendocrine differentiation may be of prognostic significance in prostate carcinoma. Mechanisms are not well characterized at this point, but the known growth factor activity of the neuroendocrine cell products, an increase in proliferation in cells surrounding neuroendocrine cells, and a lack of androgen receptor expression in neuroendocrine cells, suggest mechanisms by which they may be of prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma may be of prognostic significance, but better methods to define neuroendocrine, differentiation are necessary. The therapeutic implications of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma may be of significance and need to be explored further.
BACKGROUND: The prostatic neuroendocrine cell is a regulatory cell that produces serotonin and peptide hormones. This cell is part of a more widely dispersed diffuse neuroendocrine regulatory system known as the APUD system. Focal neuroendocrine differentiation is seen in virtually all prostate carcinomas to one degree or another. Specific malignancies that are purely neuroendocrine include small cell carcinoma and carcinoid/carcinoid-like tumors. A variety of studies suggest a possible prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma. METHODS: The literature on the prostatic neuroendocrine cell and neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma is reviewed. RESULTS: Based on analogy with other better studied elements of the diffuse neuroendocrine regulatory system or APUD system, as well as the morphology and specific products produced by neuroendocrine cells, it is likely that they play an important regulatory role in the prostate. Neuroendocrine differentiation may be of prognostic significance in prostate carcinoma. Mechanisms are not well characterized at this point, but the known growth factor activity of the neuroendocrine cell products, an increase in proliferation in cells surrounding neuroendocrine cells, and a lack of androgen receptor expression in neuroendocrine cells, suggest mechanisms by which they may be of prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS:Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma may be of prognostic significance, but better methods to define neuroendocrine, differentiation are necessary. The therapeutic implications of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate carcinoma may be of significance and need to be explored further.
Authors: Joseph E Ippolito; Jian Xu; Sanjay Jain; Krista Moulder; Steven Mennerick; Jan R Crowley; R Reid Townsend; Jeffrey I Gordon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-07-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Xiaotun Zhang; Ilsa M Coleman; Lisha G Brown; Lawrence D True; Lori Kollath; Jared M Lucas; Hung-Ming Lam; Ruth Dumpit; Eva Corey; Lisly Chéry; Bryce Lakely; Celestia S Higano; Bruce Montgomery; Martine Roudier; Paul H Lange; Peter S Nelson; Robert L Vessella; Colm Morrissey Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Herbert Augustin; Peter G Hammerer; Markus Graefen; Jüri Palisaar; Fedor Daghofer; Hartwig Huland; Andreas Erbersdobler Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2003-09-26 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Juan Miguel Mosquera; Himisha Beltran; Kyung Park; Theresa Y MacDonald; Brian D Robinson; Scott T Tagawa; Sven Perner; Tarek A Bismar; Andreas Erbersdobler; Rajiv Dhir; Joel B Nelson; David M Nanus; Mark A Rubin Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 5.715