Literature DB >> 8673496

A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect.

B Anderson1.   

Abstract

Subjects with left hemispatial neglect frequently demonstrate an array of abnormal behaviours on line bisection tasks. They misbisect long horizontal lines to the right of true midline. They bisect short lines to the left of true midline. They exaggerate the left-sided length of lines when placing the endpoints for 'invisible' lines, and they underestimate the length of the left side of long lines that are shown to them bisected accurately. No current theory of neglect explains all these features of line bisection behaviour. A mathematical model of line bisection behaviour in neglect is presented that proposes that subjects bisect lines at the point where they perceive the 'salience' of the two line segments created by their bisection mark to be equal. Salience is determined by the brain's attentional systems which map salience amplitude to spatial position following a bell shaped distribution. Right hemisphere strokes simulated by decreasing the 'height' and "breadth' of the right hemisphere salience to position function produced all of the above features of clinical neglect subjects' line bisection behaviour. Neglect may be conceived of as damage to brain systems performing mappings between stimulus characteristics (such as spatial location) and salience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8673496     DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.3.841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  21 in total

Review 1.  Spatial neglect.

Authors:  A Kirk
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Visual search pattern during the line quadrisection task in normal subjects.

Authors:  Byung H Lee; Yong Jeong; Sue J Kang; Min J Baek; Juhee Chin; John C Adair; Duk L Na
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Modeling orienting behavior and its disorders with "ecological" neural networks.

Authors:  Andrea Di Ferdinando; Domenico Parisi; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task.

Authors:  Sergio Chieffi; Tina Iachini; Alessandro Iavarone; Giovanni Messina; Andrea Viggiano; Marcellino Monda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The role of the right superior temporal gyrus in stimulus-centered spatial processing.

Authors:  Priyanka P Shah-Basak; Peii Chen; Kevin Caulfield; Jared Medina; Roy H Hamilton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Crossover by line length and spatial location.

Authors:  M Mennemeier; S Z Rapcsak; C Pierce; E Vezey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Modelling the differential effects of prisms on perception and action in neglect.

Authors:  Steven Leigh; James Danckert; Chris Eliasmith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A search for the optimal stimulus.

Authors:  M Mennemeier; S Z Rapcsak; M Dillon; E Vezey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.