Literature DB >> 8673359

The measurement of hand preference: a validation study comparing three groups of right-handers.

D V Bishop1, V A Ross, M S Daniels, P Bright.   

Abstract

Three groups of right-handers were identified using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. Exclusive strong right-handers (Rs: N = 18) reported that they always used the right hand for eight or more of the 10 activities, and usually used the right hand for the remainder. Exclusive weak right-handers (Rw: N = 15) usually used the right hand for three or more activities, and always used the right hand for the remainder. Predominant right-handers (Rp: N = 18) preferred the right hand for most items, but used the left hand for at least one activity. These groups did not differ on three measures of relative skill of the two hands: peg-moving, tapping and dotting. Groups Rs and Rw were also indistinguishable in terms of the hand used for reaching for cards placed in different spatial positions. However, the reaching measure did discriminate group Rp, which included some individuals who reached predominantly with the left hand. It is concluded that preference batteries should quantify degree of hand preference in terms of the number of activities for which a preference is shown, ignoring the distinction between 'usually' and 'always'. The behavioural reaching measure shows promise as a method for providing a unitary scale of hand preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8673359     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02590.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  32 in total

1.  Effort, success, and nonuse determine arm choice.

Authors:  Nicolas Schweighofer; Yupeng Xiao; Sujin Kim; Toshinori Yoshioka; James Gordon; Rieko Osu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Is Hand Selection Modulated by Cognitive-perceptual Load?

Authors:  Jiali Liang; Krista Wilkinson; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Hand use for grasping in a bimanual task: evidence for different roles?

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Devon C Bryant; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A Field-Based Testing Protocol for Assessing Gross Motor Skills in Preschool Children: The CHAMPS Motor Skills Protocol (CMSP).

Authors:  Harriet G Williams; Karin A Pfeiffer; Marsha Dowda; Chevy Jeter; Shaverra Jones; Russell R Pate
Journal:  Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci       Date:  2009

5.  An experiential avoidance conceptualization of depressive rumination: three tests of the model.

Authors:  Jeannette M Giorgio; Jacqueline Sanflippo; Evan Kleiman; Dan Reilly; Rachel E Bender; Clara A Wagner; Richard T Liu; Lauren B Alloy
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2010-07-17

6.  Motor asymmetry in elite fencers.

Authors:  Selcuk Akpinar; Robert L Sainburg; Sadettin Kirazci; Andrzej Przybyla
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Grasping with the eyes of your hands: hapsis and vision modulate hand preference.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Sensorimotor performance asymmetries predict hand selection.

Authors:  A Przybyla; C J Coelho; S Akpinar; S Kirazci; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Investigating the effects of handedness on the consistency of lateralization for speech production and semantic processing tasks using functional transcranial Doppler sonography.

Authors:  L Bruckert; P A Thompson; K E Watkins; D V M Bishop; Z V J Woodhead
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2021-03-09

10.  Procedural and declarative memory in children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Jarrad A G Lum; Celin Gelgic; Gina Conti-Ramsden
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.