Literature DB >> 8672483

The determinants of pKas in proteins.

J Antosiewicz1, J A McCammon, M K Gilson.   

Abstract

Although validation studies show that theoretical models for predicting the pKas of ionizable groups in proteins are increasingly accurate, a number of important questions remain: (1) What factors limit the accuracy of current models? (2) How can conformational flexibility of proteins best be accounted for? (3) Will use of solution structures in the calculations, rather than crystal structures, improve the accuracy of the computed pKas? and (4) Why does accurate prediction of protein pKas seem to require that a high dielectric constant be assigned to the protein interior? This paper addresses these and related issues. Among the conclusions are the following: (1) computed pKas averaged over NMR structure sets are more accurate than those based upon single crystal structures; (2) use of atomic parameters optimized to reproduce hydration energies of small molecules improves agreement with experiment when a low protein dielectric constant is assumed; (3) despite use of NMR structures and optimized atomic parameters, pKas computed with a protein dielectric constant of 20 are more accurate than those computed with a low protein dielectric constant; (4) the pKa shifts in ribonuclease A that result from phosphate binding are reproduced reasonably well by calculations; (5) the substantial pKa shifts observed in turkey ovomucoid third domain result largely from interactions among ionized groups; and (6) both experimental data and calculations indicate that proteins tend to lower the pKas of Asp side chains but have little overall effect upon the pKas of other ionizable groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8672483     DOI: 10.1021/bi9601565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  137 in total

1.  Molecular basis for pH sensitivity and proton transfer in green fluorescent protein: protonation and conformational substates from electrostatic calculations.

Authors:  C Scharnagl; R Raupp-Kossmann; S F Fischer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Increasing protein stability by altering long-range coulombic interactions.

Authors:  G R Grimsley; K L Shaw; L R Fee; R W Alston; B M Huyghues-Despointes; R L Thurlkill; J M Scholtz; C N Pace
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  A self-consistent, microenvironment modulated screened coulomb potential approximation to calculate pH-dependent electrostatic effects in proteins.

Authors:  E L Mehler; F Guarnieri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Calculation of weak protein-protein interactions: the pH dependence of the second virial coefficient.

Authors:  A H Elcock; J A McCammon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Tanford-Kirkwood electrostatics for protein modeling.

Authors:  J J Havranek; P B Harbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Thermodynamic linkage between the binding of protons and inhibitors to HIV-1 protease.

Authors:  J Trylska; J Antosiewicz; M Geller; C N Hodge; R M Klabe; M S Head; M K Gilson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  A study on the mechanism of the proton transport in bacteriorhodopsin: the importance of the water molecule.

Authors:  K Murata; Y Fujii; N Enomoto; M Hata; T Hoshino; M Tsuda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Mechanism of the gBP21-mediated RNA/RNA annealing reaction: matchmaking and charge reduction.

Authors:  Ulrich F Müller; H Ulrich Göringer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The ionization state and the conformation of Glu-71 in the KcsA K(+) channel.

Authors:  Simon Bernèche; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Thermodynamics and kinetics of actin filament nucleation.

Authors:  D Sept; J A McCammon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.