Literature DB >> 8671135

General practitioners' attitudes to variations in referral rates and how these could be managed.

J Wright1, J Wilkinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital referral rates have received widespread attention for both clinical and economic reasons.
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to find out the views of general practitioners in North Yorkshire on current arrangements for the feedback of routine referral data, perceived factors that influenced their referral behaviour and changes that might help their referral decisions.
METHOD: Survey questions were chosen from the issues raised during semi-structured interviews with 11 selected practices. A postal questionnaire was sent to all 114 general practices in North Yorkshire.
RESULTS: A 60% (68/114) response rate was obtained from the postal questionnaire. The majority of practices agreed that the referral information supplied by them was accurate (77%) and that the feedback of this data was useful (66%). Uncertainty of diagnosis/management and patient pressure were the two most commonly agreed factors that were suggested as influencing referral behaviour. Training in procedures and use of clinical guidelines were the most popular changes chosen as being helpful in referral decision making.
CONCLUSIONS: The feedback of routine referral data is considered accurate and useful, and should continue. Expanding opportunities for the training of general practitioners in specific skills and the development of clinical guidelines for the management and referral of commonly suggested areas would be helpful to general practitioners in making referral decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8671135     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/13.3.259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  5 in total

1.  Referral management centres: more Hackney carriage than Trojan horse.

Authors:  David Keene
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-22

2.  General practitioners' reflections on referring: an asymmetric or non-dialogical process?

Authors:  Olav Thorsen; Miriam Hartveit; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  Interface flow process audit: using the patient's career as a tracer of quality of care and of system organisation.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Unger; Bruno Marchal; Sylvie Dugas; Marie-Jeanne Wuidar; Daniel Burdet; Pierre Leemans; Jacques Unger
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 5.120

4.  Examining the variation in GPs' referral practice: a cross-sectional study of GPs' reasons for referral.

Authors:  Unni Ringberg; Nils Fleten; Olav Helge Førde
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  What causes increasing and unnecessary use of radiological investigations? A survey of radiologists' perceptions.

Authors:  Kristin B Lysdahl; Bjørn M Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.