Literature DB >> 8670926

Effects of a doubled orthodontic force magnitude on tooth movement and root resorptions. An inter-individual study in adolescents.

P Owman-Moll1, J Kurol, D Lundgren.   

Abstract

The aim of this clinical and histological study was to compare the effects of two controlled, continuous forces of 50 cN (approximately 50 g) and 100 cN (approximately 100 g) on tooth movement and root resorptions. The patients, consisting of 32 individuals, 14 boys and 18 girls (mean age 13.1 years), were divided into four groups of eight individuals. The experimental periods were 4 and 7 weeks. In this investigation, designed as an inter-individual study, only the maxillary first premolar on the right side was utilized. The test tooth was buccally moved by means of a fixed orthodontic appliance. A continuous, weekly controlled force of 50 cN was applied to 16 premolars and a force of 100 cN to the remaining 16 test teeth. The force declined on average 22 per cent during the first week when 50 cN was applied and 27 per cent when 100 cN was applied. Tooth movements were studied on dental casts using a coordinate measuring machine. After 4 and 7 weeks, the tooth movements ranged between 0.5 and 3.4 mm (4 weeks) and 2.7 and 7.1 mm (7 weeks) for 50 cN and between 1.0 and 2.9 mm (4 weeks) and 2.2 and 8.3 mm (7 weeks) for 100 cN, with no significant difference when the force magnitude was doubled. Root resorptions were registered in histological sections in all experimental teeth, more frequently after application of 50 cN compared with 100 cN after 7 weeks. However, the severity of root resorption (extension and depth of resorbed root contour and size of root area on histological sections) did not differ significantly when the applied force was doubled to 100 cN. Great individual variations were noted regarding both the magnitude of tooth movement and amount of root resorption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8670926     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/18.2.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  18 in total

Review 1.  Root resorptions in upper first premolars after application of continuous intrusive forces. Intra-individual study.

Authors:  R M Faltin; V E Arana-Chavez; K Faltin; F G Sander; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effects of orthodontic force magnitude on cell apoptosis and RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis : Studies in a rat model.

Authors:  S Kaya; M Çifter; A Çekici; V Olgaç; H İşsever; G Işık
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Three-dimensional morphology of root and alveolar trabecular bone during tooth movement using micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Li Zhuang; Yuxing Bai; Xianying Meng
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Evaluation of root resorption following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Asli Baysal; Irfan Karadede; Seyit Hekimoglu; Faruk Ucar; Törün Ozer; Ilknur Veli; Tancan Uysal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Effects of different types of tooth movement and force magnitudes on the amount of tooth movement and root resorption in rats.

Authors:  Takako Nakano; Hitoshi Hotokezaka; Megumi Hashimoto; Irin Sirisoontorn; Kotaro Arita; Takeshi Kurohama; M Ali Darendeliler; Noriaki Yoshida
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Comparison of movement rate with different initial moment-to-force ratios.

Authors:  Shuning Li; Jie Chen; Katherine S Kula
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Maxillary canine retraction with self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Maurício Mezomo; Eduardo S de Lima; Luciane Macedo de Menezes; André Weissheimer; Susiane Allgayer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Human tooth movement by continuous high and low stresses.

Authors:  Whitney N Deforest; Jodi K Hentscher-Johnson; Ying Liu; Hongzeng Liu; Jeffrey C Nickel; Laura R Iwasaki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  The effect of differential force system and minimal surgical intervention on orthodontic tooth movement and root resorption.

Authors:  Anjali Nanda; Po-Jung Chen; Shivam Mehta; Zana Kalajzic; Eliane H Dutra; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Ravindra Nanda; Sumit Yadav
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Forced orthodontic eruption for augmentation of soft and hard tissue prior to implant placement.

Authors:  Rafael Scaf de Molon; Erica Dorigatti de Avila; João Antonio Chaves de Souza; Andressa Vilas Boas Nogueira; Carolina Chan Cirelli; Rogerio Margonar; Joni Augusto Cirelli
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.