Literature DB >> 8669503

The regionalization of perinatal care in Wales and Washington State.

R A Rosenblatt1, A Macfarlane, A J Dawson, P H Cartlidge, E H Larson, L G Hart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare perinatal regionalization and neonatal mortality in Wales and Washington State.
METHODS: The 28 hospitals in Wales and the 80 hospitals in Washington State that offered maternity services and the 218,326 births that occurred in these hospitals in 1989 and 1990 were studied. Surveys were used to identify the neonatal technology and the referral policies of each hospital, and linked data from birth and death certificates were used to examine birthweight-specific neonatal mortality rates for all babies born in these hospitals.
RESULTS: Welsh district general hospitals (broadly equivalent to Level II perinatal centers in the United States) have more sophisticated neonatal technology than their Washington State counterparts and appear less likely to refer small or preterm babies to regional or subregional centers. Neonatal mortality rates were quite similar in the two settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal care in Wales appears to be less regionalized than in a similar region in the United States. The relative lack of perinatal regionalization in Wales may contribute to duplication and underutilization of expensive neonatal technologies. National health care systems do not, in and of themselves, lead to optimal regionalization of services.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8669503      PMCID: PMC1380444          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.7.1011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  Poverty, technology and recent trends in the United States infant mortality rate.

Authors:  P H Wise
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Socioeconomic differences in mortality in Britain and the United States.

Authors:  G D Smith; M Egger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Regionalization of perinatal care.

Authors:  P M Dunn
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.901

4.  Revised U.S. certificate of birth: a view from England.

Authors:  A Macfarlane
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Outcomes of regionalized perinatal care in Washington State.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; J A Mayfield; L G Hart; L M Baldwin
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-07

6.  The competition vogue and its outcomes.

Authors:  W A Glaser
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The regionalization of perinatal care.

Authors:  M C McCormick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Survival and place of treatment after premature delivery.

Authors:  D Field; S Hodges; E Mason; P Burton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  The survival of very low-birth weight infants by level of hospital of birth: a population study of perinatal systems in four states.

Authors:  S Gortmaker; A Sobol; C Clark; D K Walker; A Geronimus
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Newborn intensive care and neonatal mortality in low-birth-weight infants: a population study.

Authors:  N Paneth; J L Kiely; S Wallenstein; M Marcus; J Pakter; M Susser
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rural surgery in British Columbia: is there anybody out there?

Authors:  Nancy Humber; Temma Frecker
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Severe sepsis in pre-hospital emergency care: analysis of incidence, care, and outcome.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Thomas D Rea; Jeremy M Kahn; Allan J Walkey; Donald M Yealy; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Organisation of obstetric services for very preterm births in Europe: results from the MOSAIC project.

Authors:  B Blondel; E Papiernik; D Delmas; W Künzel; T Weber; R F Maier; L Kollée; J Zeitlin
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 4.  United States and territory policies supporting maternal and neonatal transfer: review of transport and reimbursement.

Authors:  E M Okoroh; C D Kroelinger; S M Lasswell; D A Goodman; A M Williams; W D Barfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Delivery models of rural surgical services in British Columbia (1996-2005): are general practitioner-surgeons still part of the picture?

Authors:  Nancy Humber; Temma Frecker
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.089

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.