PURPOSE: Eudragit RL and RS 30D are pseudolatexes frequently used in the coating of solid dosage forms. They are based on cationic copolymers stabilized with quaternary ammonium groups (poly(ethylacrylate-methylmethacrylate-trimethylammonioethyl methacrylate chloride). A pH-independent drug release is expected because of the quaternary nature of the cationic groups. The objective was to explain a distinct "pH-dependent" drug release in various buffer media with coated diltiazem beads. METHODS: The diltiazem HCl release from and water uptake of Eudragit RS/RL-coated beads was determined in various buffers of different buffer species, pH or concentration. RESULTS: The drug release in the different buffer media was in the following order: pH 5.0 acetate > pH 3.5 formate > pH 7.4 phosphate buffer > 0.1M HCl). This "pH-dependent" drug release could be explained with an anion exchange process; the chloride counterions of the quaternary groups were exchanged with the anionic buffer species during the dissolution study. The water uptake of the coated beads correlated well with the drug release from the beads. Increasing the buffer strength (acetate buffer) first increased and then decreased the drug release, while increasing the ionic strength of different buffers with NaCl decreased the drug release and eliminated the observed buffer effects because of the excess of chloride ions. CONCLUSIONS: The anionic buffer species and not the pH had a significant effect on the hydration and hence on the drug release from beads coated with the cationic polymers, Eudragit RS and RL.
PURPOSE: Eudragit RL and RS 30D are pseudolatexes frequently used in the coating of solid dosage forms. They are based on cationic copolymers stabilized with quaternary ammonium groups (poly(ethylacrylate-methylmethacrylate-trimethylammonioethyl methacrylate chloride). A pH-independent drug release is expected because of the quaternary nature of the cationic groups. The objective was to explain a distinct "pH-dependent" drug release in various buffer media with coated diltiazem beads. METHODS: The diltiazem HCl release from and water uptake of Eudragit RS/RL-coated beads was determined in various buffers of different buffer species, pH or concentration. RESULTS: The drug release in the different buffer media was in the following order: pH 5.0 acetate > pH 3.5 formate > pH 7.4 phosphate buffer > 0.1M HCl). This "pH-dependent" drug release could be explained with an anion exchange process; the chloride counterions of the quaternary groups were exchanged with the anionic buffer species during the dissolution study. The water uptake of the coated beads correlated well with the drug release from the beads. Increasing the buffer strength (acetate buffer) first increased and then decreased the drug release, while increasing the ionic strength of different buffers with NaCl decreased the drug release and eliminated the observed buffer effects because of the excess of chloride ions. CONCLUSIONS: The anionic buffer species and not the pH had a significant effect on the hydration and hence on the drug release from beads coated with the cationic polymers, Eudragit RS and RL.