Literature DB >> 8668392

Ethics and the care of critically ill infants and children. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics.

.   

Abstract

The ability to provide life support to ill children who, not long ago, would have died despite medicine's best efforts challenges pediatricians and families to address profound moral questions. Our society has been divided about extending the life of some patients, especially newborns and older infants with severe disabilities. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) supports individualized decision making about life-sustaining medical treatment for all children, regardless of age. These decisions should be jointly made by physicians and parents, unless good reasons require invoking established child protective services to contravene parental authority. At this time, resource allocation (rationing) decisions about which children should receive intensive care resources should be made clear and explicit in public policy, rather than be made at the bedside.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Academy of Pediatrics; Death and Euthanasia; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8668392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  13 in total

Review 1.  Parental refusal of medical treatment for a newborn.

Authors:  John J Paris; Michael D Schreiber; Michael P Moreland
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2007

2.  Using a new analysis of the best interests standard to address cultural disputes: whose data, which values?

Authors:  Loretta M Kopelman; Arthur E Kopelman
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2007

3.  Decisional challenges for children requiring assisted ventilation at home.

Authors:  Kathleen Cranley Glass; Franco A Carnevale
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2006-09

4.  Development of a Test of Residents' Ethics Knowledge for Pediatrics (TREK-P).

Authors:  Jennifer C Kesselheim; Graham T McMahon; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-06

5.  Réfléchir, c'est déjà prendre une décision: Le processus décisionnel des pédiatres face à une situation de fin de vie.

Authors:  Claude Cyr; Ngoc Bich Hoang
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Consultation of parents in actual end-of-life decision-making in neonates and infants.

Authors:  Veerle Provoost; Filip Cools; Peter Deconinck; José Ramet; Reginald Deschepper; Johan Bilsen; Freddy Mortier; Yvan Vandenplas; Luc Deliens
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 7.  Sustaining life or prolonging dying? Appropriate choice of conservative care for children in end-stage renal disease: an ethical framework.

Authors:  Janis M Dionne; Lori d'Agincourt-Canning
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Pediatric Ethics and Communication Excellence (PEACE) Rounds: Decreasing Moral Distress and Patient Length of Stay in the PICU.

Authors:  Lucia Wocial; Veda Ackerman; Brian Leland; Brian Benneyworth; Vinit Patel; Yan Tong; Mara Nitu
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2017-03

9.  A Framework for the Development of maternal quality of care indicators.

Authors:  Lisa M Korst; Kimberly D Gregory; Michael C Lu; Carolina Reyes; Calvin J Hobel; Gilberto F Chavez
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-09

10.  Are the GFRUP's recommendations for withholding or withdrawing treatments in critically ill children applicable? Results of a two-year survey.

Authors:  R Cremer; A Binoche; O Noizet; C Fourier; S Leteurtre; G Moutel; F Leclerc
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.