Literature DB >> 17975739

Parental refusal of medical treatment for a newborn.

John J Paris1, Michael D Schreiber, Michael P Moreland.   

Abstract

When there is a conflict between parents and the physician over appropriate care due to an infant whose decision prevails? What standard, if any, should guide such decisions?This article traces the varying standards articulated over the past three decades from the proposal in Duff and Campbell's 1973 essay that these decisions are best left to the parents to the Baby Doe Regs of the 1980s which required every life that could be salvaged be continued. We conclude with support for the policy articulated in the 2007 guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics on non-intervention or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17975739     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-007-9046-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  25 in total

1.  Delivery room resuscitation decisions for extremely low birthweight infants in California.

Authors:  J C Partridge; H Freeman; E Weiss; A M Martinez
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Saving defective infants: options for life or death.

Authors:  John J Paris; Richard A McCormick
Journal:  America (NY)       Date:  1983-04-23

3.  Substituting our judgment.

Authors:  A M Capron
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.683

4.  Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in babies of very low birth weight. Is CPR futile therapy?

Authors:  J D Lantos; S H Miles; M D Silverstein; C B Stocking
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-01-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Viability, morbidity, and resource use among newborns of 501- to 800-g birth weight. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.

Authors:  J E Tyson; N Younes; J Verter; L L Wright
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Ethical issues in neonatology: a U.S. perspective.

Authors:  A R Fleischman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Mongolism, parental desires, and the right to life.

Authors:  J M Gustafson
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 1.416

8.  Neonatologists judge the "Baby Doe" regulations.

Authors:  L M Kopelman; T G Irons; A E Kopelman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-03-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Ethical issues in quadruple amputation in a child with meningococcal septic shock.

Authors:  J J Paris; V Newman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Guarantee my child will be "normal" or stop all treatment.

Authors:  J J Paris; A J Bell
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.521

View more
  4 in total

1.  Birthing ethics: what mothers, families, childbirth educators, nurses, and physicians should know about the ethics of childbirth.

Authors:  Jennifer M Torres; Raymond G De Vries
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2009

Review 2.  Periviable birth: A review of ethical considerations.

Authors:  E Gkiougki; I Chatziioannidis; A Pouliakis; N Iacovidou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  A life worth giving? The threshold for permissible withdrawal of life support from disabled newborn infants.

Authors:  Dominic James Wilkinson
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Conflict in a paediatric hospital: a prospective mixed-method study.

Authors:  Liz Forbat; Charlotte Sayer; Phillip McNamee; Esse Menson; Sarah Barclay
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.791

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.