Literature DB >> 8667543

Mentally disabled research subjects. The enduring policy issues.

R Dresser1.   

Abstract

Mentally disabled adults often serve as subjects in research on mental illness, developmental disabilities, dementia, and other conditions associated with mental impairment. Since US regulatory policy fails to resolve many ethical issues presented by such research, investigators and institutional review boards must determine the appropriate standards and procedures for studies involving adults with mental disabilities. Procedures for capacity assessment and information disclosure should enhance the autonomy of capable subjects and accurately identify subjects incapable of independent choice. Research teams should inform proxy decision makers of their ethical responsibities. Decisionally incapable adults objecting to research involvement should rarely be included in studies. Researchers, institutional review boards, advocacy groups, and federal officials should collaborate to improve evaluation of risks and potential benefits to decisionally incapable subjects. These groups should also seek consensus on appropriate risk limits in studies presenting no prospect of direct benefit to decisionally incapable subjects. Finally, subject populations should be represented in research planning and review activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belmont Report; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Mental Health Therapies; National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8667543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  17 in total

1.  Public bioethics and research involving persons with mental disorders.

Authors:  P Backlar
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1999-10

2.  Developing regulations for research involving adults who lack decision-making capacity.

Authors:  A R Fleischman
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1999

Review 3.  The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Marie Caputo; Christopher Burant
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-03

4.  Neurocognitive indicators predict results of an informed-consent quiz among substance-dependent treatment seekers entering a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Brian D Kiluk; Charla Nich; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.582

5.  Financial capacity in persons with schizophrenia and serious mental illness: clinical and research ethics aspects.

Authors:  Daniel C Marson; Robert Savage; Jacqueline Phillips
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Advance directives for subjects of research who have fluctuating cognitive impairments due to psychotic disorders (such as schizophrenia).

Authors:  P Backlar
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1998-06

Review 7.  Advance directives for non-therapeutic dementia research: some ethical and policy considerations.

Authors:  R L Berghmans
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 8.  Teaching ethics of psychopharmacology research in psychiatric residency training programs.

Authors:  Eugene V Beresin; Ross J Baldessarini; Jonathan Alpert; Jerrold Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The use of multimedia in the informed consent process.

Authors:  H B Jimison; P P Sher; R Appleyard; Y LeVernois
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  "You can't be cold and scientific": community views on ethical issues in intellectual disability research.

Authors:  Katherine E McDonald; Nicole M Schwartz; Colleen M Gibbons; Robert S Olick
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.