Literature DB >> 86665

Coronary-artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris: Survival at two years. European Coronary Surgery Study Group.

.   

Abstract

768 men aged under 65 with angina pectoris, at least 50% obstruction in two or more major vessels, and a left-ventricular ejection fraction greater than or equal to 0.5 took part in a prospective randomised trial of the effect of coronary-artery bypass on prognosis. 373 patients were alloted to medical and 395 to surgical treatment. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the distribution of variables recorded at the time of randomisation. 1. "surgical" patient was lost to follow-up. 26 "surgical" patients did not undergo surgery and 50 "medical" patients were operated on. All these 76 patients were retained in their original treatment groups for the analysis. At 2 years there was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups. A significant difference was, however, found in the subset of patients with three-vessel disease, survival being significantly better for surgical patients. Operative (in-hospital) mortality was 3.6% in all operated patients and 1.5% in the last third. On average, 1.9 grafts per patient were inserted in the two-vessel-disease subgroup and 2.4 grafts per patient in the three-vessel-disease subgroup. Graft-patency rate was 90% within 9 months and 77% between 9 and 18 months after surgery. Symptomatic improvement was significantly better and deterioration less in the surgical group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 86665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  12 in total

Review 1.  What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  S Hollis; F Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-11

2.  Revascularize only for ischemia, especially if left ventricular function is poor.

Authors:  Mark I Travin
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?

Authors:  Ross M Reul
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

4.  Coronary bypass graft surgery: reexamining the assumptions.

Authors:  H S Friedman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yader Sandoval; Emmanouil S Brilakis; Mariana Canoniero; Demetris Yannopoulos; Santiago Garcia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-03

6.  Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  James J Jang; Manjushri Bhapkar; Adrian Coles; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; Christopher B Fordyce; Kerry L Lee; James E Udelson; Udo Hoffmann; Jean-Claude Tardif; W Schuyler Jones; Daniel B Mark; Vincent L Sorrell; Andrey Espinoza; Pamela S Douglas; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Presidential address. Coronary bypass surgery: status 1979.

Authors:  R S Ross
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1980

8.  Effect of aortocoronary bypass surgery on coronary circulation and myocardial metabolism during atrial pacing.

Authors:  S Nakata; H Yokota; K Kodama; S Nanto; H Hirose; Y Kawashima
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 9.  Aggressive medical management of coronary artery disease versus mechanical revascularization.

Authors:  Elaine Chiquette; Robert Chilton
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.113

10.  Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.