Literature DB >> 8664672

Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?

J Lenaghan1, B New, E Mitchell.   

Abstract

Citizens' juries are an attempt to meaningfully involve members of the public in decisions which affect them in their own communities. The Institute for Public Policy Research and Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority have recently piloted the first jury in the United Kingdom. Sixteen jurors sat for four days, hearing evidence from a number of expert witnesses. The jurors were asked to consider how priorities for health care should be set, according to what criteria, and to what extent the public should be involved in this process. This pilot was also an attempt to assess the process itself, and our initial evaluation indicates that, given enough time and information, the public is willing and able to contribute to the debate about priority setting in health care.

Keywords:  Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority; Health Care and Public Health; Institute for Public Policy Research (London); National Health Service

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8664672      PMCID: PMC2351315          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  1 in total

1.  Health care rationing: the public's debate.

Authors:  A Bowling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-16
  1 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?

Authors:  O F Norheim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-27

2.  Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values.

Authors:  Penelope M. Mullen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Choices without reasons: citizens' juries and policy evaluation.

Authors:  D Price
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  Eliciting reasons: empirical methods in priority setting.

Authors:  Andreas Hasman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-03

Review 5.  On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research.

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas; Naomi Fulop; Diane Gagnon; Pauline Allen
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.

Authors:  Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Jeremy Horwood; Michael Calnan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-22

8.  Health needs assessment. Whose priorities? Listening to users and the public.

Authors:  J Jordan; T Dowswell; S Harrison; R J Lilford; M Mort
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-30

Review 9.  What is the evidence base for public involvement in health-care policy?: results of a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Annalijn Conklin; Zoë Morris; Ellen Nolte
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Mark Helfand; Sean Tunis; Evelyn P Whitlock; Stephen G Pauker; Anirban Basu; Jon Chilingerian; Frank E Harrell; David O Meltzer; Victor M Montori; Donald S Shepard; David M Kent
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.