Literature DB >> 8663953

Otoplasty. Clinical protocol and long-term results.

A H Messner1, W S Crysdale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term results after otoplasty on prominent ears.
DESIGN: Between 1988 and 1993, ear protrusion was measured preoperatively and postoperatively in pediatric patients undergoing otoplasty by means of a standard protocol based on the Frankfort horizontal line. Patients were asked to return for follow-up measurements a minimum of 1 year after surgery. At the time of follow-up, a patient satisfaction survey was completed by the patients and their families.
SETTING: The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, a tertiary care children's hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one of 51 patients returned for follow-up an average of 3.7 years after surgery.
RESULTS: One third of ears returned to their original position, one third of ears stayed in a position equal to the immediate postoperative position, and one third of ears had final positions between the preoperative and post-operative positions. At the superior rim, an average of 58% of the operative medialization was lost. Good to excellent ear-to-ear symmetry was obtained in 78% of patients who returned for follow-up. Retrospective chart review showed a revision surgery rate of 3%; stitch granulomas were removed in 9% of patients. The patient satisfaction survey found that 85% of patients were happy or very happy with their ears.
CONCLUSIONS: With time, a substantial loss of correction can be expected in most (but not all) patients who undergo otoplasty, particularly at the upper pole. Overall, patients and their families are happy with the results of otoplasty surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8663953     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890190069016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  7 in total

1.  Quality of life and patients' satisfaction after otoplasty.

Authors:  C Bermueller; H Kirsche; A Sebert; N Rotter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Using bilaterally fascioperichondrial flaps with a distal and a proximal base combined with conventional otoplasty.

Authors:  Saime Irkoren; Deniz Kucukkaya; Nazan Sivrioglu; Heval Selman Ozkan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Clinical results and health-related quality of life in otoplasty patients using cartilage resection and suturing methods.

Authors:  Yuksel Toplu; Emrah Sapmaz; Cemal Firat; Sibel Altunisik Toplu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparison of the result of consolidative technique otoplasty and incisionless otoplasty in the repairs of prominent ears.

Authors:  Metin Temel; Ş Şamil Kahraman; Özge Berber; Cengiz Çevik; Ertap Akoğlu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Treatment of Prominent Ears with an Implantable Clip System: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Norbert V Kang; Ryan L Kerstein
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.283

Review 6.  Earfold: A New Technique for Correction of the Shape of the Antihelix.

Authors:  Norbert V Kang; Walid Sabbagh; Greg O'Toole; Michael Silberberg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Otoplasty: a modified Chong-Chet technique with positive long-term results.

Authors:  Darko Jović; Ljubiša Preradović; Aleksandar Guzijan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.