Literature DB >> 23670232

Using bilaterally fascioperichondrial flaps with a distal and a proximal base combined with conventional otoplasty.

Saime Irkoren1, Deniz Kucukkaya, Nazan Sivrioglu, Heval Selman Ozkan.   

Abstract

Prominent ears are the most common aesthetic abnormality of the external ear. Mustardè sutures and conchal setback are usually used for otoplasty, additional various cartilage-manipulation methods are also presented. One adjunctive technique that is often used involves the elevation of a fascial flap beneath which is sutured for additional cover, potentially reducing the risk of complications and recurrence. In the literature, this flap is traditionally raised with a proximal or distal base but it can be raised both distally and proximally with a number of advantages as we demonstrate. This article presents a technique to raise the fascioperichondrial flap with both a proximal and a distal base as an addition to conventional otoplasty. One hundred consecutive patients, followed up for at least 12 months, have been reviewed. One hundred ninety otoplasties were performed in 100 patients (10 unilateral), 65 women and 35 men. The mean age was 20.6 years, and the mean follow-up time was 16.3 months, respectively. No patient has developed skin necrosis or suture extrusion. In two patients (One bilateral and one unilateral for a total of three ears) a further procedure has been required to improve symmetry (1.5%). Using the retro auricular fascioperichondrial flap combined with other techniques offers good results and can be used as a standard procedure in the surgical treatment of prominent ears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23670232     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2552-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  28 in total

1.  Otoplasty: what I do now--a 30-year perspective.

Authors:  M Spira
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Complications following correction of prominent ears: an audit review of 122 cases.

Authors:  S L Jeffery
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1999-10

3.  A METHOD OF ANTIHELIX RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  V CHONGCHET
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1963-07

4.  A new strategy for otoplasty.

Authors:  K Shokrollahi; M A Cooper; L Y Hiew
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  The value of head dressings in the postoperative management of the prominent ear.

Authors:  B W Powell
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1989-11

6.  Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures.

Authors:  D W Furnas
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears.

Authors:  A J McDowell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Otoplasty: the experience of 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  P Yugueros; J A Friedland
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Otoplasty. Clinical protocol and long-term results.

Authors:  A H Messner; W S Crysdale
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1996-07

Review 10.  Otoplasty: anterior scoring and posterior rolling technique in adults.

Authors:  Fatih Peker; Bahattin Celiköz
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.326

View more
  2 in total

1.  Outcomes and Complications of the Mustardé Otoplasty: A "Good-Fast-Cheap" Technique for the Prominent Ear Deformity.

Authors:  Matthew L Boroditsky; Aaron C Van Slyke; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-24

2.  Clinical results and health-related quality of life in otoplasty patients using cartilage resection and suturing methods.

Authors:  Yuksel Toplu; Emrah Sapmaz; Cemal Firat; Sibel Altunisik Toplu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.503

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.