Literature DB >> 8661977

A new biochemical marker of bone resorption for follow-up on treatment with nasal salmon calcitonin.

K Overgaard1, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized group comparison, new and specific biochemical markers for bone resorption as follow-up parameters on the therapeutic response to nasal salmon calcitonin (sCT) were evaluated. Evaluation took place at an outpatient clinic where osteoporosis was being researched. The subjects included 208 women aged 68-72 treated for 2 years with either 50 IU, 100 IU, or 200 IU of nasal sCT or placebo; all groups received a daily calcium supplementation of 500 mg. Only 164 women fulfilled the study as valid completers. Markers were applied to frozen urine samples of a previously published intervention study of a new fasting urinary (fU) biochemical marker for bone resorption (CrossLapstrade mark, ELISA) and the urinary excretion of cross-links (pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline) was measured, all corrected for creatinine. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and rates of vertebral and peripheral fractures were measured after 2 years of treatment. The creatinine corrected urinary pyridinoline, deoxypyridinoline, and CrossLaps showed maximum decreases of 10-43% (95% confidence interval -29.5% to 9.6% and -75.1% to 9.3%; P < 0. 01-0.001) after 6-9 months, after which the response leveled off. A significant difference among the four treatment groups was seen in fU CrossLaps (P < 0.01). The changes in spinal bone mass were significantly related to the decreases in fU CrossLaps: women with the highest response in spinal bone mass had decreases in fU CrossLaps of 44% (-83.5% to 7.4%) and women without response of 5% (-57.6% to 99.9%) P < 0.001). In women who fractured during the 2-year period, fU CrossLaps remained unchanged, whereas decreases of 30% (-75.1% to 44.7%) were seen in women who did not fracture (P = 0. 002). The results suggest that biochemical markers can be used to determine the optimum treatment regimen of nasal sCT. The response of the new marker, fU CrossLaps, significantly reflects the responses in bone mass of the spine and fracture rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8661977     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  22 in total

1.  Nasal calcitonin for treatment of established osteoporosis.

Authors:  K Overgaard; B J Riis; C Christiansen; J Pødenphant; J S Johansen
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.478

2.  Dose-response bioactivity and bioavailability of salmon calcitonin in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K Overgaard; D Agnusdei; M A Hansen; E Maioli; C Christiansen; C Gennari
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Recommended methods for the determination of four enzymes in blood.

Authors: 
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 1.713

4.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover to monitor the bone response to postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  B J Riis; K Overgaard; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  An easy and reliable method for determination of urinary hydroxyproline.

Authors:  J Pødenphant; N E Larsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1984-09-15       Impact factor: 3.786

7.  Discontinuous calcitonin treatment of established osteoporosis--effects of withdrawal of treatment.

Authors:  K Overgaard; M A Hansen; V A Nielsen; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Effect of salcatonin given intranasally on bone mass and fracture rates in established osteoporosis: a dose-response study.

Authors:  K Overgaard; M A Hansen; S B Jensen; C Christiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-05

9.  Usefulness of regional bone measurements in patients with osteoporotic fractures of the spine and distal forearm.

Authors:  L Nilas; J Pødenphant; B J Riis; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Two biochemical indices of mouse bone formation are increased, in vivo, in response to calcitonin.

Authors:  J R Farley; S L Hall; S Herring; N M Tarbaux
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Nasal calcitonin.

Authors:  S L Silverman
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Early effect of nasal salmon calcitonin on the bone marker Crosslaps.

Authors:  Demet Ofluoglu; Evrim Karadag-Saygi; Cuneyt Canbulat; Osman Hakan Gunduz; Evren Kul-Panza; Gulseren Akyuz
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 2.631

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.