Literature DB >> 7492867

Biochemical markers of bone turnover to monitor the bone response to postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy.

B J Riis1, K Overgaard, C Christiansen.   

Abstract

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prevents postmenopausal bone loss, and is therefore increasingly prescribed to prevent the development of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Because of individual differences in the response to HRT as well as problems with compliance, it has been debated how the skeletal response to HRT should be monitored. When estrogen production decreases at the menopause, a number of biochemical markers of bone turnover increase considerably in the order of 50%-100% from baseline. When HRT is instituted, the markers decrease again within the following 3-6 months. In the present prospective study we investigated whether the determination of biochemical markers of bone turnover may be useful for monitoring the skeletal effect of HRT. Seventy-six early postmenopausal women received HRT and 43 received placebo. The treatment period was 24 months and the women were followed with repeated bone mass measurements (every 3 months) which allowed calculation of the bone loss. Serum and urine samples were collected at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. The placebo group lost a significant amount of bone mineral density in both the forearm and the spine (p < 0.001), whereas the HRT group did not. There was, however, a relatively large overlap of values between the HRT and placebo groups, especially in the spine. After 3 months' treatment the correlation between the changes in the markers and the bone loss was r = 0.59, and this value increased to r = 0.66 at 6 months and r = 0.76 and r = 0.77 at 12 and 24 months, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7492867     DOI: 10.1007/bf01774018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

1.  Bone mass measured by photon absorptiometry: comparison of forearm, heel, and spine.

Authors:  M A Hansen; B J Riis; K Overgaard; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.713

2.  Cyproterone acetate, an alternative gestagen in postmenopausal oestrogen/gestagen therapy.

Authors:  B J Riis; J Jensen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.478

3.  En recherche de la différence (P less than 0.05).

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1986-04

4.  Early menopausal changes in bone mass and sex steroids.

Authors:  C C Johnston; S L Hui; R M Witt; R Appledorn; R S Baker; C Longcope
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  The minimum effective dose of estrogen for prevention of postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  R Lindsay; D M Hart; D M Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Dose-response evaluation of cyclic estrogen/gestagen in postmenopausal women: placebo-controlled trial of its gynecologic and metabolic actions.

Authors:  M S Christensen; C Hagen; C Christiansen; I Transbøl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-12-15       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  An easy and reliable method for determination of urinary hydroxyproline.

Authors:  J Pødenphant; N E Larsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1984-09-15       Impact factor: 3.786

8.  Effect of salcatonin given intranasally on early postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  K Overgaard; B J Riis; C Christiansen; M A Hansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-19

9.  Risk of endometrial cancer after treatment with oestrogens alone or in conjunction with progestogens: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  I Persson; H O Adami; L Bergkvist; A Lindgren; B Pettersson; R Hoover; C Schairer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-21

10.  Urinary excretion of pyridinoline crosslinks correlates with bone turnover measured on iliac crest biopsy in patients with vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  P D Delmas; A Schlemmer; E Gineyts; B Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Who are candidates for prevention and treatment for osteoporosis?

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Tight control: a new therapeutic strategy in the management of osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  A Halasi; G Kincse; J Varga; J Kéri; J Gaál
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  UGT2B17 gene deletion associated with an increase in bone mineral density similar to the effect of hormone replacement in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Giroux; J Bussières; A Bureau; F Rousseau
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure: manifestations and management.

Authors:  Julian R Molina; Debra L Barton; Charles L Loprinzi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Decreased bone mineral density at the distal radius, but not at the lumbar spine or the femoral neck, in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  T Majima; Y Komatsu; T Yamada; Y Koike; M Shigemoto; C Takagi; I Hatanaka; K Nakao
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-11-19       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A new biochemical marker of bone resorption for follow-up on treatment with nasal salmon calcitonin.

Authors:  K Overgaard; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Quantifying the Balance Between Total Bone Formation and Total Bone Resorption: An Index of Net Bone Formation.

Authors:  Albert Shieh; Weijuan Han; Shinya Ishii; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.958

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.