Literature DB >> 19727935

Trainee surgeons do not cause more conversions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised.

Takafumi Maeda1, Kok-Yang Tan, Fumio Konishi, Shingo Tsujinaka, Ken Mizokami, Junichi Sasaki, Yutaka J Kawamura.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study was designed to look at the conversion rates and morbidity associated with laparoscopic operations performed by trainee surgeons ascending the learning curve when they are well supervised by staff surgeons.
METHODS: A review of 204 consecutive cases was performed. We defined experienced staff surgeons as those who have performed more than 300 laparoscopic resection cases. The trainee surgeons had less than 50 cases of experience during the study period. All operations were performed by the experienced staff surgeon or by the trainee surgeon with the staff surgeon as the first assistant and supervisor.
RESULTS: A total of 204 laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer were studied. The dissection was D3 in 73% (n = 149) of cases with a mean lymph node harvest of 19.4 nodes (range 1-56). The staff surgeons performed 90 cases and trainees performed 114 cases. Twenty-one cases (10.3%) required conversion. The overall morbidity rate was 17.6% and perioperative mortality rate was 1.5%. On bivariate analysis, trainee surgeons were not found to be significantly associated with a higher conversion risk. Multivariate analysis revealed that only the factor of T3 and above was an independent predictor of conversion (odds ratio (OR) 4.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-15.48). Multivariate analysis of risk factors for morbidity revealed that it was not conversion (OR 2.37; 95% CI, 0.86-6.76) but rectal surgery (OR 4.09; 95% CI 2.04-9.9) that was the independent risk factor of morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: Inexperienced surgeons do not cause more conversions or postoperative morbidity in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if they are well supervised. Conversion is not independently associated with increased postoperative morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19727935     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0188-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  17 in total

Review 1.  Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; P A Seshadri; M Cadeddu; R Gregoire; E C Poulin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ned S Abraham; Christopher M Byrne; Jane M Young; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for Stage 0/I rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Kenichi Yoshimura; Fumio Konishi; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy with lymph node dissection for invasive carcinoma of the colon.

Authors:  F Konishi; M Okada; H Nagai; A Ozawa; H Kashiwagi; K Kanazawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Systematic review on the short-term outcome of laparoscopic resection for colon and rectosigmoid cancer.

Authors:  J J Tjandra; M K Y Chan
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.788

6.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

7.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Surgeon volume does not predict outcomes in the setting of technical credentialing: results from a randomized trial in colon cancer.

Authors:  David W Larson; Peter W Marcello; Sergio W Larach; Steven D Wexner; Adrian Park; John Marks; Anthony J Senagore; Alan G Thorson; Tonia M Young-Fadok; Erin Green; Daniel J Sargent; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  N A Rotholtz; M Laporte; G Zanoni; M E Bun; L Aued; S Lencinas; N A Mezzadri; L Pereyra
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  10 in total

1.  A multi-modal approach to training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery accelerates proficiency gain.

Authors:  John T Jenkins; Andrew Currie; Stefano Sala; Robin H Kennedy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Accelerated learning curve for colorectal resection, open versus laparoscopic approach, can be attained with expert supervision.

Authors:  T Maeda; K Y Tan; Fumio Konishi; S Tsujinaka; K Mizokami; J Sasaki; Y J Kawamura
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Simulation and its role in training.

Authors:  Hoda Samia; Sadaf Khan; Justin Lawrence; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

4.  Mentored trainees obtain comparable operative results to experts in complex laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Federico Costantino; Didier Mutter; Jacopo D'Agostino; Mario Dente; Joël Leroy; Hurng Sheng Wu; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of single port access colorectal surgery: a single institutional case-matched study.

Authors:  Sébastien Gaujoux; Léon Maggiori; Frédéric Bretagnol; Marianne Ferron; Yves Panis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees.

Authors:  Hugh Mackenzie; Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Amjad Parvaiz; Austin G Acheson; John T Jenkins; John Griffith; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Role of Digital Resources in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Training.

Authors:  Heidi Paine; Manish Chand
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-29

8.  How to reduce the laparoscopic colorectal learning curve.

Authors:  Miguel Toledano Trincado; Javier Sánchez Gonzalez; Francisco Blanco Antona; Maria Luz Martín Esteban; Laura Colao García; Jorge Cuevas Gonzalez; Agustin Mayo Iscar; Jose Ignacio Blanco Alvarez; Juan Carlos Martín del Olmo
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients' outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Keisuke Kazama; Masakatsu Numata; Toru Aoyama; Yosuke Atsumi; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Teni Godai; Hiroyuki Saeki; Yusuke Saigusa; Manabu Shiozawa; Norio Yukawa; Munetaka Masuda; Yasushi Rino
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  A classification of the verbal methods currently used to teach endoscopy.

Authors:  Deng Mapiour; Michelle Prytula; Michael Moser
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.