Literature DB >> 8661796

Comparison of manual and ultrasonographic evaluation of bladder size in patients prior to laparoscopy.

J D Greig1, M Mahadaven, T G John, O J Garden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheterization of the bladder may reduce laparoscopic complications although an enlarged bladder may be impalpable in overweight patients or following previous lower abdominal surgery.
METHODS: This study assessed bladder size by manual examination and transcutaneous ultrasound (US). Consecutive patients (n = 90; median age 55 years [20-85]; 61 females) undergoing laparoscopy were studied prospectively. All patients voided preoperatively and catheterization was performed if estimated US bladder volumes exceeded 300 ml.
RESULTS: Manual assessment failed to detect bladder enlargement in any patients (sensitivity: 0%; specificity: 4.4%), whereas ultrasound identified four patients at risk of bladder injury due to unsuspected enlargement (4.4%). Three of these patients were either overweight or obese and one patient had previous lower abdominal surgery. Of 12 patients (13%) catheterized, three had or developed urinary tract infections.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative voiding does not guarantee bladder emptying. Manual examination does not detect bladder enlargement reliably in the obese patient. Ultrasonography may improve patient selection for catheterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8661796     DOI: 10.1007/bf00191633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  Gynaecological laparoscopy. The Report of the Working Party of the Confidential Enquiry into Gynaecological Laparoscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1978-06

2.  The evaluation by means of ultrasounds of the bladder residue after gynaecological operations.

Authors:  U Mangano; A Sammartino; S Caschetto
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 0.196

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the Dundee technique.

Authors:  L K Nathanson; S Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; F Dubois; J Mouiel; P Mouret; H Becker; G Buess; M Trede; H Troidl
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Is bladder catheterization really necessary before laparoscopy?

Authors:  M S Akhtar; D M Beere; J T Wright; K D MacRae
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-11

6.  [Distribution of the incidence of various pelviscopic (laparoscopic) surgical procedures and their complication rates. A statistical analysis in West Germany 1983 up to and including 1985].

Authors:  H H Riedel; E Lehmann-Willenbrock; H Mecke; K Semm
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.

Authors:  D J Deziel; K W Millikan; S G Economou; A Doolas; S T Ko; M C Airan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Determining residual urine volumes using a portable ultrasonographic device.

Authors:  J P Revord; J L Opitz; P Murtaugh; J Harrison
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients.

Authors:  R W Bailey; K A Zucker; J L Flowers; W A Scovill; S M Graham; A L Imbembo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.969

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Validation of an ultrasound scanner for determing urinary volumes in surgical patients and volunteers.

Authors:  T A Brouwer; B G Eindhoven; A H Epema; R H Henning
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  On-table urethral catheterisation during laparoscopic appendicectomy: Is it necessary?

Authors:  Gregory J Nason; Sher N Baig; Matthew J Burke; Asadullah Aslam; Michael E Kelly; Leon G Walsh; Hugh D Flood; Subhasis K Giri
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Factors Influencing Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Elective Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Siddharth Narasimhan Aiyer; Ajit Kumar; Ajoy Prasad Shetty; Rishi Mugesh Kanna; Shanmuganath Rajasekaran
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  Michigan Appropriate Perioperative (MAP) criteria for urinary catheter use in common general and orthopaedic surgeries: results obtained using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.

Authors:  Jennifer Meddings; Ted A Skolarus; Karen E Fowler; Steven J Bernstein; Justin B Dimick; Jason D Mann; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 7.035

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.