Literature DB >> 8660109

Low dose desensitisation does not reduce the toxicity of sulphasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis.

I B McInnes1, D Porter, E A Murphy, E A Thomson, R Madhok, J A Hunter, T Pullar, H A Capell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the proposal that pretreatment low dose desensitisation may reduce the incidence of toxicity of sulphasalazine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: A double blind, placebo controlled trial was performed with 422 patients satisfying the American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA who required sulphasalazine treatment because of increased disease activity. Patients received either sulphasalazine desensitisation, or placebo, for three weeks before commencement of sulphasalazine treatment. The frequency and nature of adverse effects and changes in clinical and laboratory parameters of disease activity were measured after three and six months.
RESULTS: Improvement in the efficacy of sulphalasazine (measured by clinical and laboratory parameters) was significant and similar in magnitude in both groups. There was no significant difference between actively and placebo desensitised patients as regards the incidence or profile of adverse effects (toxicity).
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment low dose desensitisation is unhelpful in reducing the toxicity associated with sulphasalazine treatment of RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8660109      PMCID: PMC1010172          DOI: 10.1136/ard.55.5.328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  12 in total

1.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  F C Arnett; S M Edworthy; D A Bloch; D J McShane; J F Fries; N S Cooper; L A Healey; S R Kaplan; M H Liang; H S Luthra
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1988-03

2.  Effects of hydroxychloroquine and sulphasalazine on progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D M van der Heijde; P L van Riel; I H Nuver-Zwart; F W Gribnau; L B vad de Putte
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Leucopenia during sulphasalazine treatment for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Marabani; R Madhok; H A Capell; J A Hunter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Sulphasalazine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: relationship of dose and serum levels to efficacy.

Authors:  T Pullar; J A Hunter; H A Capell
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1985-08

5.  Sulphasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis: desensitising the patient with a skin rash.

Authors:  D E Bax; R S Amos
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Outcome of attempts to treat rheumatoid arthritis with gold, penicillamine, sulphasalazine, or dapsone.

Authors:  K A Grindulis; B McConkey
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Long-term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with sulphasalazine, gold, or penicillamine: a comparison using life-table methods.

Authors:  R D Situnayake; K A Grindulis; B McConkey
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  The comparative efficacy and toxicity of second-line drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Results of two metaanalyses.

Authors:  D T Felson; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1990-10

9.  Sulphasalazine for rheumatoid arthritis: toxicity in 774 patients monitored for one to 11 years.

Authors:  R S Amos; T Pullar; D E Bax; D Situnayake; H A Capell; B McConkey
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-08-16

10.  Outcome of second line therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D R Porter; I McInnes; J Hunter; H A Capell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.