Literature DB >> 7864689

Outcome of second line therapy in rheumatoid arthritis.

D R Porter1, I McInnes, J Hunter, H A Capell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the functional outcome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who tolerate second line drug therapy for five years.
METHODS: We enrolled into prospective controlled trials, 190 patients with rheumatoid arthritis who tolerated 'disease modifying' antirheumatic drug therapy for five years. Demographic data were recorded. Disease activity was measured every six months for two years and annually thereafter, using clinical and laboratory variables. Patient function was measured using the modified Health Assessment Questionnaire. The change in each variable was analysed using paired Wilcoxon tests.
RESULTS: Patient function improved significantly compared with baseline. The improvement was maximal after one to two years, and thereafter function started to decline slowly. After five years of treatment the patients' function was still significantly better than before treatment had started. There were highly significant improvements in all variables measured to assess disease activity, which remained well controlled throughout the five year period.
CONCLUSION: Good control of disease activity and improved function can be achieved long term in approximately 30% of RA patients treated with injectable gold, sulphasalazine or penicillamine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7864689      PMCID: PMC1005481          DOI: 10.1136/ard.53.12.812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  19 in total

1.  A three year follow up of patients allocated to placebo, or oral or injectable gold therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H A Capell; D Lewis; J Carey
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  A rheumatological dilemma: is it possible to modify the course of rheumatoid arthritis? Can we answer the question?

Authors:  T Pullar; H A Capell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Effect of acetylator phenotype on efficacy and toxicity of sulphasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  T Pullar; J A Hunter; H A Capell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Gold salts in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. A double-blind study.

Authors:  J W Sigler; G B Bluhm; H Duncan; J T Sharp; D C Ensign; W R McCrum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Effects of hydroxychloroquine and sulphasalazine on progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D M van der Heijde; P L van Riel; I H Nuver-Zwart; F W Gribnau; L B vad de Putte
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Sulphasalazine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: relationship of dose and serum levels to efficacy.

Authors:  T Pullar; J A Hunter; H A Capell
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1985-08

7.  Outcome of attempts to treat rheumatoid arthritis with gold, penicillamine, sulphasalazine, or dapsone.

Authors:  K A Grindulis; B McConkey
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Long-term outcome of treating rheumatoid arthritis: results after 20 years.

Authors:  D L Scott; D P Symmons; B L Coulton; A J Popert
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Long-term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with sulphasalazine, gold, or penicillamine: a comparison using life-table methods.

Authors:  R D Situnayake; K A Grindulis; B McConkey
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  The 'natural' history of active rheumatoid arthritis over 3-6 months--an analysis of patients enrolled into trials of potential disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and treated with placebo.

Authors:  D R Porter; H A Capell
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-06
View more
  5 in total

1.  Does sulphasalazine cause drug induced systemic lupus erythematosus? No effect evident in a prospective randomised trial of 200 rheumatoid patients treated with sulphasalazine or auranofin over five years.

Authors:  M M Gordon; D R Porter; H A Capell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  [Drug therapy of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  U Arndt; M Rittmeister; B Möller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Rheumatology.

Authors:  A Bradlow; J David
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-11

4.  Low dose desensitisation does not reduce the toxicity of sulphasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  I B McInnes; D Porter; E A Murphy; E A Thomson; R Madhok; J A Hunter; T Pullar; H A Capell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Sulfasalazine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C P Rains; S Noble; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.546

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.