Literature DB >> 8657840

The effects of scopolamine, lorazepam, and glycopyrrolate on classical conditioning of the human eyeblink response.

M Bahro1, B G Schreurs, T Sunderland, S E Molchan.   

Abstract

Human eyeblink conditioning, a relatively simple form of learning and memory, has previously been shown to be impaired by the central and peripheral anticholinergic scopolamine. The present study compared the behavioral effects of scopolamine with the benzodiazepine lorazepam and a peripherally active anticholinergic, glycopyrrolate. Thirty-six healthy normal volunteers (mean age: 23.7 years) were studied with 12 assigned double-blind to each of three drug conditions (0.5 mg scopolamine IV, 2 mg lorazepam PO, or 0.2 mg glycopyrrolate IV). Subjects underwent classical conditioning of the eyeblink response in which the conditioned stimulus was an 80 dB binaural tone, and the unconditioned stimulus was a 2 psi airpuff to the right eye. Ten trials of unpaired stimulus presentations were followed by 60 paired trials and finally by an extinction period of five tone-alone presentations. An eyeblink response that occurred during the tone but before the airpuff was scored as a conditioned response (CR). Subjects treated with lorazepam (43% mean CRs) and scopolamine (51% mean CRs) exhibited a significantly lower asymptotic level of conditioning than those treated with glycopyrrolate (85% mean CRs; P < 0.01). However, during extinction, lorazepam-treated subjects (35% CRs) showed a lower overall level of responding to the tone than either scopolamine (60% CRs) or glycopyrrolate (62% CRs) treated subjects (P < 0.05). It seems unlikely that these differences could be accounted for by drug-induced alterations in motor responses because there were no significant differences between the three drug conditions in the frequency, latency, or amplitude of unconditioned responses to the airpuff. Overall, our data indicate that scopolamine and lorazepam impair eyeblink conditioning and suggest that some of the effects of benzodiazepines and anticholinergics on learning and memory can be differentiated using this paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8657840     DOI: 10.1007/bf02246273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  31 in total

Review 1.  Neurobiological substrates of classical conditioning across the life span.

Authors:  D S Woodruff-Pak; C G Logan; R F Thompson
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Models of memory dysfunctions.

Authors:  H Weingartner
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Imaging of memory-specific changes in the distribution of protein kinase C in the hippocampus.

Authors:  J L Olds; M L Anderson; D L McPhie; L D Staten; D L Alkon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-08-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Mammalian brain substrates of aversive classical conditioning.

Authors:  D G Lavond; J J Kim; R F Thompson
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Eyeblink conditioning discriminates Alzheimer's patients from non-demented aged.

Authors:  D S Woodruff-Pak; R G Finkbiner; D K Sasse
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Hippocampectomy disrupts trace eye-blink conditioning in rabbits.

Authors:  J R Moyer; R A Deyo; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Interaction of GABAergic and beta-noradrenergic drugs in the regulation of memory storage.

Authors:  I B Introini-Collison; C Castellano; J L McGaugh
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1994-03

8.  Disruption of human eyeblink conditioning after central cholinergic blockade with scopolamine.

Authors:  P R Solomon; M E Groccia-Ellison; D Flynn; J Mirak; K R Edwards; A Dunehew; M E Stanton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Anticholinergic sensitivity in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type and age-matched controls. A dose-response study.

Authors:  T Sunderland; P N Tariot; R M Cohen; H Weingartner; E A Mueller; D L Murphy
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1987-05

10.  Effects of diazepam and triazolam on auditory and visual thresholds and reaction times in the baboon.

Authors:  S E Lukas; R D Hienz; J V Brady
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  3 in total

1.  Discrimination reversal conditioning of an eyeblink response is impaired by NMDA receptor blockade.

Authors:  J D Churchill; J T Green; S E Voss; E Manley; J E Steinmetz; P E Garraghty
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar

2.  The effect of scopolamine in older rabbits tested in the 750 ms delay eyeblink classical conditioning procedure.

Authors:  Diana S Woodruff-Pak; John T Green; Jonathan T Pak; Boris Heifets; Michelle H Pak
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun

3.  Adaptive robotic control driven by a versatile spiking cerebellar network.

Authors:  Claudia Casellato; Alberto Antonietti; Jesus A Garrido; Richard R Carrillo; Niceto R Luque; Eduardo Ros; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Egidio D'Angelo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.