Literature DB >> 86572

Different sensitivity of chromatin to acid denaturation in quiescent and cycling cells as revealed by flow cytometry.

Z Darzynkiewicz, F Traganos, M Andreeff, T Sharpless, M R Melamed.   

Abstract

The properties of DNA in situ as reflected by its staining with acridine orange are different in quiescent nonstimulated lymphocytes as compared with interphase lymphocytes that have entered the cell cycle after stimulation by mitogens. The difference is seen after cell treatment with buffers at pH 1.5 (1.3-1.9 range) followed by staining with acridine orange at pH 2.6 (2.3-2.9). Under these conditions the red metachromatic fluorescence of the acridine orange-DNA complex is higher in quiescent cells than in the cycling lymphocytes while the orthochromatic green fluorescence is higher in the cycling, interphase cells. The results suggest that DNA in condensed chromatin of quiescent lymphocytes (as in metaphase chromosomes) is more sensitive to acid-denaturation than DNA in dispersed chromatin of the cycling interphase cells. The phenomenon is used for flow cytometric differentiation between G0 and G1 cells and between G2 and M cells. In contrast to normal lymphocytes the method applied to neoplastic cells indicates the presence of cell subpopulations with condensed chromatin but with DNA content characteristic not only of G1 but also of S and G2 cells. The possibility that these cells represent quiescent (resting) subpopulations, arrested in G1, S and/or G2, is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 86572     DOI: 10.1177/27.1.86572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem        ISSN: 0022-1554            Impact factor:   2.479


  13 in total

1.  Different instability of nuclear DNA at acid hydrolysis in cancerous and noncancerous cells as revealed by fluorescent staining with acridine orange.

Authors:  M Fukuda; N Miyoshi; T Hattori; H Sugihara; Y Hosokawa; K Nakanishi
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1986

2.  The nuclear position of pericentromeric DNA of chromosome 11 appears to be random in G0 and non-random in G1 human lymphocytes.

Authors:  R Hulspas; A B Houtsmuller; P J Krijtenburg; J G Bauman; N Nanninga
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Comparison of human and mouse sperm chromatin structure by flow cytometry.

Authors:  D P Evenson; Z Darzynkiewicz; M R Melamed
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Mitotic rate, DNA distribution, and chromatin in situ sensitivity to heparin in breast cancer.

Authors:  H Weiss; H P Brasching; A Bock; F Mauthner; U Peek
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Reactions of seven basic fluorochromes with unfixed cells obtained from the salivary glands of the dipteran fly Megaselia scalaris Loew (Phoridae).

Authors:  S K Curtis; R R Cowden; D B Benner
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1986

6.  Do cells of continually renewing populations and those stimulated from quiescence respond similarly to HU and Ara-C?

Authors:  H P Benton; M R Alison
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Interphase flow-cytogenetics: correlation of DNA fluorescence to aneuploidy in human fibroblast cultures.

Authors:  P S Rabinovitch; G M Martin; H Hoehn
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Flow cytometric applications to tumour biology: prospects and pitfalls.

Authors:  M R Raju; T S Johnson; N Tokita; E L Gillette
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1980-04

9.  Cytometric detection of chromatin relaxation, an early reporter of DNA damage response.

Authors:  H Dorota Halicka; Hong Zhao; Monika Podhorecka; Frank Traganos; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Quantitative detection of DNA damage in the neuronal cells of the cerebellum and cerebrum by the analysis of Feulgen hydrolysis curves.

Authors:  N Miyoshi; M Fukuda
Journal:  Histochemistry       Date:  1986
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.