Literature DB >> 8653646

Why is there no progress against cervical cancer?

M M Cohen.   

Abstract

The author reflects on the disheartening report given by Dr. E. Jean Parboosingh and associates on Canadian screening programs for cervical cancer (see pages 1847 to 1853 of this issue). Although cancer of the cervix is one of the few preventable forms of cancer, little progress has been made toward the establishment of programs to control this disease. Barriers to progress include a lack of priority given to women's health issues, insufficient public awareness of cervical cancer, the absence of vocal lobby groups, poor understanding of the limitations of secondary prevention, uncertainty about professional jurisdiction and the financial commitment of government, a tendency for minutiae to deflect attention from essential aims and the sheer complexity of the task of prevention and control. Unless these barriers are overcome it is unlikely that there will be much progress toward the eradication of cervical cancer in Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8653646      PMCID: PMC1487731     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  4 in total

Review 1.  Report of a National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix.

Authors:  A B Miller; G Anderson; J Brisson; J Laidlaw; N Le Pitre; P Malcolmson; P Mirwaldt; G Stuart; W Sullivan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  A review of the epidemiology of human breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Kelsey
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 3.  Risk factors for cervical cancer.

Authors:  B S Hulka
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1982

4.  Cost effectiveness of cervical cancer screening for the elderly.

Authors:  M C Fahs; J Mandelblatt; C Schechter; C Muller
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

  4 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  How can we develop a cost-effective quality cervical screening programme?

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Helen Lester
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Cervical cancer: screening hard-to-reach groups.

Authors:  E Grunfeld
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.