Literature DB >> 1503355

Cost effectiveness of cervical cancer screening for the elderly.

M C Fahs1, J Mandelblatt, C Schechter, C Muller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the costs and benefits of alternative cervical cancer screening schedules among elderly women.
SETTING: Population-based screening programs.
DESIGN: A Markov model predicts the outcomes of periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment for cervical cancer among women from 65 to 109 years of age. PATIENTS: A hypothetical cohort of one million 65-year-old women; representative of the U.S. population. MEASUREMENTS: The costs and yields of screening.
RESULTS: Triennial screening reduced mortality from cervical cancer among the elderly by 74% at a cost of $2254 per year of life saved. Annual screening increased costs to $7345 per year of life saved; less frequent schedules yielded lower costs but decreased savings in life. These results were most sensitive to the quality of the Papanicolaou smear and the characteristics of the women using the benefit. If the sensitivity of the Papanicolaou smear was reduced from a baseline estimate of 75% to 50% and the specificity was decreased to 87% from 95%, the cost effectiveness ratio increased by nearly $7000 per year of life saved. If triennial screening is targeted to women who have not had regular screening, the program will save money as well as years of life; however, screening women who have been screened regularly is considerably less efficient, increasing costs to $33,572 per year of life saved.
CONCLUSION: The success of the new Medicare benefit depends substantially on physicians assuring that their elderly patients, particularly women without regular prior screening, obtain high quality Papanicolaou smears. The data also show that after a woman 65 years of age or older has a history of regular negative smears, screening is inefficient and can cease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1503355     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-6-520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  18 in total

1.  Why is there no progress against cervical cancer?

Authors:  M M Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; D G Fryback; M C Weinstein; L B Russell; M R Gold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Cervical cancer screening in the United States and the Netherlands: a tale of two countries.

Authors:  Dik Habbema; Inge M C M De Kok; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 4.  Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.

Authors:  M C Fahs; S B Plichta; J S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Assessing the annual economic burden of preventing and treating anogenital human papillomavirus-related disease in the US: analytic framework and review of the literature.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Erik J Dasbach; Elamin H Elbasha
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Effect of Educational Intervention on Cervical Cancer Prevention and Screening in Hispanic Women.

Authors:  Olivia W Foley; Nicole Birrer; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Rachel M Clark; Elizabeth DiTavi; Marcela G Del Carmen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-12

7.  The frequency of Pap smear screening in the United States.

Authors:  Brenda E Sirovich; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Fluorescence spectroscopy for diagnostic differentiation in uteri's cervix biopsies with cervical/vaginal atypical cytology.

Authors:  Ademir Barianni Rodero; Landulfo Silveira; David Augusto Rodero; Roberto Racanicchi; Marcos Tadeu T Pacheco
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Comparison of charges related to radiotherapy for soft-tissue sarcomas treated by preoperative external-beam irradiation versus interstitial implantation.

Authors:  N A Janjan; A W Yasko; G P Reece; M J Miller; J A Murray; M I Ross; M M Romsdahl; M J Oswald; T G Ochran; R E Pollock
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Epidemiologic natural history and clinical management of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Disease: a critical and systematic review of the literature in the development of an HPV dynamic transmission model.

Authors:  Ralph P Insinga; Erik J Dasbach; Elamin H Elbasha
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.