Literature DB >> 8648992

[Glare sensitivity of phakic and pseudophakic eyes].

D Eisenmann1, F K Jacobi, B Dick, K W Jacobi, W Pabst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glare disability and appearance of halos may be side-effects of cataract, but were also described in patients with multifocal IOLs. The aim of this study was to compare glare sensitivity and halo size in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Contrast sensitivity without and with glare and halos around a light source were measured by means of a new computerized test in patients with cataract, monofocal IOLs, multizonal progressive and diffractive multifocal IOLs as well as in a younger control group of subjects with clear lenses. Glare acuity was measured at three different luminance settings.
RESULTS: Patients with cataract showed the most important reduction in contrast sensitivity, noticed significantly larger halos and were more impaired in glare acuity than patients with monofocal or multizonal progressive IOLs. There was no significant difference in any criteria between these two pseudophakic groups. Subjects with a clear cristalline lens had statistically significant better results compared with all other groups.
CONCLUSION: An increase in glare sensitivity and the appearance of halos are more important in patients with even minor cataracts than in any pseudophakic population. As a consequence of this study, night driving ability should be carefully examined in any pseudophakic patient, but also in any subject with even beginning cataract.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8648992     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1035175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd        ISSN: 0023-2165            Impact factor:   0.700


  5 in total

1.  Measurement of stray light and glare: comparison of Nyktotest, Mesotest, stray light meter, and computer implemented stray light meter.

Authors:  L J van Rijn; C Nischler; D Gamer; L Franssen; G de Wit; R Kaper; D Vonhoff; G Grabner; H Wilhelm; H J Völker-Dieben; T J T P van den Berg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  S Pieh; B Lackner; G Hanselmayer; R Zöhrer; M Sticker; H Weghaupt; A Fercher; C Skorpik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Contrast sensitivity and glare disability by halogen light after monofocal and multifocal lens implantation.

Authors:  S Schmitz; H B Dick; F Krummenauer; O Schwenn; R Krist
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  [Subjective and objective outcome following implantation of the apodized diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR].

Authors:  K Petermeier; P Szurman
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Comparison of higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity in monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Chang Yeom Kim; So-Hyang Chung; Tae-Im Kim; Young Jae Cho; Geunyoung Yoon; Kyoung Yul Seo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.