Literature DB >> 8648847

Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumor: laparoscopy versus open surgery and impact of learning curve.

G Janetschek1, A Hobisch, L Höltl, G Bartsch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumors was compared to open surgery, taking into account the impact of the learning curve.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 1992 and September 1995, 29 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Open surgical retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed on 30 patients between January 1988 and July 1992.
RESULTS: A comparison of the 14 initial and 15 subsequent laparoscopies showed a steep learning curve (operative time shorter by 36%, blood loss decreased by 50% and postoperative hospital stay shorter by 27%). When comparing the last 15 laparoscopic procedures to the open operations, the latter were superior only in terms of operative time (shorter by 18%). With regard to all other parameters open surgery was inferior (increased blood loss by 38%, longer postoperative hospital stay by 166%, more serious complications and a greater complication rate). Antegrade ejaculation was preserved after all laparoscopic and after 28 of the 30 open operations. There were no retroperitoneal recurrences in either group (mean followup 16 months after laparoscopy and 54 months after open surgery).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is a demanding operation that is superior to open surgery once the learning curve has been overcome. However, this is possible only if laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy is performed on a regular basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8648847     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65948-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  Challenges of laparoscopic resection of abdominal neuroblastoma with lymphadenectomy. A preliminary report.

Authors:  T Iwanaka; M Arai; M Ito; H Kawashima; K Matoba; S Imaizumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: is there a learning curve?

Authors:  K Shapiro; S Patel; Z Abdo; G Ferzli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Extraperitoneal laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after chemotherapy for nonseminomatous testicular germ-cell tumor: surgical and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Yoichi Arai; Yasuhiro Kaiho; Shigeyuki Yamada; Hideo Saito; Koji Mitsuzuka; Shinichi Yamashita; Shunichi Namiki; Haruo Nakagawa; Shigeto Ishidoya; Akihiro Ito
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  [Post-chemotherapy laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in low volume residual germ cell cancer: a technique to reduce morbidity].

Authors:  S Aufderklamm; T Todenhöfer; J Hennenlotter; G Gakis; J Mischinger; J Mundhenk; M Germann; A Stenzl; C Schwentner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  [Complex residual tumors after chemotherapy of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Laparoscopic management - limits and chances].

Authors:  S Aufderklamm; T Todenhöfer; J Hennenlotter; J Mischinger; A Sim; J Böttge; S Rausch; S Bier; O Halalsheh; A Stenzl; G Gakis; C Schwentner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Robotic Primary RPLND for Stage I Testicular Cancer: a Review of Indications and Outcomes.

Authors:  Heather J Chalfin; Wesley Ludwig; Phillip M Pierorazio; Mohamad E Allaf
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Endosurgical procedures for pediatric solid tumors.

Authors:  Tadashi Iwanaka; Mari Arai; Hiroshi Kawashima; Sumi Kudou; Jun Fujishiro; Satohiko Imaizumi; Keiko Yamamoto; Ryouji Hanada; Akira Kikuchi; Toshinori Aihara; Hiroshi Kishimoto
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 8.  Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous testicular carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan Corvin; Markus Kuczyk; Aristotelis Anastasiadis; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Laparoscopic exploration in the management of retroperitoneal masses.

Authors:  A L Shalhav; S W Chan; E Bercowsky; A M Elbahnassy; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: A comparison of clinical and perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Toshihide Shishido; Takatsugu Okegawa; Kenjiro Hayashi; Kazuki Masuda; Satoru Taguchi; Yu Nakamura; Mitsuhiro Tambo; Hiroshi Fukuhara
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2021-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.