Literature DB >> 8648581

Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface.

T Jemt1, J E Rubenstein, L Carlsson, B R Lang.   

Abstract

Four centers in the United States and Sweden have been working for 2 years to develop systems and methods for measuring fit at the prosthodontic interface. Two systems are based on stylus contact techniques, one system uses a laser as its reader source, and one system is photogrammetric. All the systems are capable of providing data as three-dimensional x, y, and z axes coordinate values that can be transformed into linear and angular data that characterize the bearing surfaces of abutments or abutment replicas and their mating components in the prosthesis framework. The centroid, a single point computed from the collected data, was the measurement unit, derived for these bearing surfaces, that was used to compare the systems. All four methods can most likely detect misfits that are relevant in the clinical setting; however, only one system can be used intraorally. When any measurement system is assessed, the data should always be examined for repeatability to establish the reliability of the system. This investigation made comparisons among the measurement methods used at the four centers. It was apparent from this study that comparisons of data from measurement systems should be rounded to the nearest 10 microns. The SDs determined in the comparisons were larger than 5 microns and therefore misfits should be calculated in terms smaller than 10 microns. This final point is important to the clinician who relies on research reports about precision of fit when selecting treatment approaches in caring for the implant prosthodontic needs of their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8648581     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90491-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  11 in total

1.  Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Michael Stimmelmayr; Jan-Frederik Güth; Kurt Erdelt; Daniel Edelhoff; Florian Beuer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Passive Fit in Screw Retained Multi-unit Implant Prosthesis Understanding and Achieving: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Muaiyed Mahmoud Buzayan; Norsiah Binti Yunus
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-12-28

3.  Precision of fit of titanium and cast implant frameworks using a new matching formula.

Authors:  Marianella Sierraalta; Jose L Vivas; Michael E Razzoog; Rui-Feng Wang
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-04-08

4.  Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Mansor Rismanchian; Badrosadat Dastgheib; Farshad Bajoghli
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

5.  Impression of multiple implants using photogrammetry: description of technique and case presentation.

Authors:  David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Leticia Bagán; Beatriz Giménez; María Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-07-01

6.  Marginal adaptation of Spinell InCeram and feldspathic porcelain laminate veneers.

Authors:  Tahereh Ghaffari; Fahimeh Hamedi-Rad; Vahid Fakhrzadeh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016 May-Jun

7.  Marginal Vertical Fit along the Implant-Abutment Interface: A Microscope Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Mobilio; Alberto Fasiol; Giulio Franceschetti; Santo Catapano
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-06

8.  The influence of screw type, alloy and cylinder position on the marginal fit of implant frameworks before and after laser welding.

Authors:  Daniela Castilio; Ana Paula Ribeiro do Vale Pedreira; Paulo Henrique Orlato Rossetti; Leylha Maria Nunes Rossetti; Wellington Cardoso Bonachela
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.698

9.  Dimensional stability of two solder index materials.

Authors:  Amir Ali Reza Khaledi; Soheil Pardis; Negar Pourhatami; Zahra Hashemi Ardakani
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Nakhaei; Azam S Madani; Azizollah Moraditalab; Hamidreza Rajati Haghi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.