Literature DB >> 8645776

Developmental and genetic influences on the P50 sensory gating phenotype.

M Myles-Worsley1, H Coon, W Byerley, M Waldo, D Young, R Freedman.   

Abstract

Evoked potentials to pairs of click stimuli were recorded from 127 subjects ranging in age from 10 to 39 years to examine the developmental course of auditory sensory gating. The ratio of the amplitude of the second response to that of the first provides a quantitative measure of auditory sensory gating. Contrary to earlier results, the distribution of P50 ratios was unchanged between children and younger adolescents (10-14 years), older adolescents (15-19 years), and adults (20-29 and 30-39 years). Included in the sample were 39 adolescent twins, allowing assessment for possible genetic effects underlying the P50 sensory gating phenotype, by comparison of the similarity of the measure in monozygotic and same-sex dizygotic twin pairs. The monozygotic twins had significantly higher similarity for the P50 ratio within each twin pair than the dizygotic twins. These results are consistent with the presence of genetic influences on the P50 sensory gating phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8645776     DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(95)00134-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  15 in total

Review 1.  Differential Susceptibility of the Developing Brain to Contextual Adversity and Stress.

Authors:  W Thomas Boyce
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Generators of the intracranial P50 response in auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Mark E Pflieger; Michael Wagner; Susan M Bowyer; T Rosburg; Karthik Sundaresan; Christian Erich Elger; Nashaat N Boutros
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Progress in the Prospective Study of the Schizophrenia Prodrome.

Authors:  Emery J Fu; Kristin S Cadenhead
Journal:  Curr Psychos Ther Rep       Date:  2005-12-01

4.  Auditory sensory gating in young adolescents with early-onset psychosis: a comparison with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Cecilie Koldbæk Lemvigh; Jens Richardt Møllegaard Jepsen; Birgitte Fagerlund; Anne Katrine Pagsberg; Birte Yding Glenthøj; Jacob Rydkjær; Bob Oranje
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Genetic psychophysiology: advances, problems, and future directions.

Authors:  Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 6.  Influence of emotional states on inhibitory gating: animals models to clinical neurophysiology.

Authors:  Howard C Cromwell; Rachel M Atchley
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Oscillatory dynamics and functional connectivity during gating of primary somatosensory responses.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Nathan M Coolidge; James E Gehringer; Max J Kurz; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Neurophysiological endophenotypes of schizophrenia: the viability of selected candidate measures.

Authors:  Bruce I Turetsky; Monica E Calkins; Gregory A Light; Ann Olincy; Allen D Radant; Neal R Swerdlow
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Maturation of sensory gating performance in children with and without sensory processing disorders.

Authors:  Patricia L Davies; Wen-Pin Chang; William J Gavin
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Sensory gating endophenotype based on its neural oscillatory pattern and heritability estimate.

Authors:  L Elliot Hong; Ann Summerfelt; Braxton D Mitchell; Robert P McMahon; Ikwunga Wonodi; Robert W Buchanan; Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.