Literature DB >> 17293126

Generators of the intracranial P50 response in auditory sensory gating.

Oleg Korzyukov1, Mark E Pflieger, Michael Wagner, Susan M Bowyer, T Rosburg, Karthik Sundaresan, Christian Erich Elger, Nashaat N Boutros.   

Abstract

Clarification of the cortical mechanisms underlying auditory sensory gating may advance our understanding of brain dysfunctions associated with schizophrenia. To this end, data from nine epilepsy patients who participated in an auditory paired-click paradigm during pre-surgical evaluation and had grids of electrodes covering temporal and frontal lobe were analyzed. A distributed source localization approach was applied to the intracranial P50 response and the Gating Difference Wave obtained by subtracting the response to the second stimuli from the response to the first stimuli. Source reconstruction of the P50 showed that the main generators of the response were localized in the temporal lobes. The analysis also suggested that the maximum neuronal activity contributing to the amplitude reduction in the P50 time range (phenomenon of auditory sensory gating) is localized at the frontal lobe. Present findings suggest that while the temporal lobe is the main generator of the P50 component, the frontal lobe seems to be a substantial contributor to the process of sensory gating as observed from scalp recordings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17293126      PMCID: PMC1993359          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  48 in total

1.  A comparison of the different interpair intervals in the conditioning-testing P50 paradigms.

Authors:  N Dolu; C Süer
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Stimulus parameter effects on the P50 evoked response.

Authors:  G Zouridakis; N N Boutros
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Evaluation of different cortical source localization methods using simulated and experimental EEG data.

Authors:  Jun Yao; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulations.

Authors:  K Jerger; C Biggins; G Fein
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1992-02-15       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Auditory inhibitory gating in medial prefrontal cortex: Single unit and local field potential analysis.

Authors:  R P Mears; A C Klein; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Whole-head mapping of middle-latency auditory evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  J P Mäkelä; M Hämäläinen; R Hari; L McEvoy
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-09

7.  The effect of interstimulus intervals and between-block rests on the auditory evoked potential and magnetic field: is the auditory P50 in humans an overlapping potential?

Authors:  T Onitsuka; H Ninomiya; E Sato; T Yamamoto; N Tashiro
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Multiple supratemporal sources of magnetic and electric auditory evoked middle latency components in humans.

Authors:  B Yvert; A Crouzeix; O Bertrand; A Seither-Preisler; C Pantev
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Interpreting abnormality: an EEG and MEG study of P50 and the auditory paired-stimulus paradigm.

Authors:  J C Edgar; M X Huang; M P Weisend; A Sherwood; G A Miller; L E Adler; J M Cañive
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  Chronic epilepsy and cognition: a longitudinal study in temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Christoph Helmstaedter; Martin Kurthen; Silke Lux; Markus Reuber; Christian Erich Elger
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  53 in total

1.  Distinct neural generators of sensory gating in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Terrance J Williams; Keith H Nuechterlein; Kenneth L Subotnik; Cindy M Yee
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Intracranial recording and source localization of auditory brain responses elicited at the 50 ms latency in three children aged from 3 to 16 years.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Eishi Asano; Valentina Gumenyuk; Csaba Juhász; Michael Wagner; Robert D Rothermel; Harry T Chugani
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of audiovisual speech processing.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer; Michael Wagner; Curtis W Ponton
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The neural networks underlying auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  A R Mayer; F M Hanlon; A R Franco; T M Teshiba; R J Thoma; V P Clark; J M Canive
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  sLORETA allows reliable distributed source reconstruction based on subdural strip and grid recordings.

Authors:  Matthias Dümpelmann; Tonio Ball; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Attention modulates topology and dynamics of auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Sanja Josef Golubic; Miljenka Jelena Jurasic; Ana Susac; Ralph Huonker; Theresa Gotz; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Mapping repetition suppression of the P50 evoked response to the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Nash N Boutros; Klevest Gjini; Simon B Eickhoff; Horst Urbach; Mark E Pflieger
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  A pilot study revealing impaired P50 gating in antisocial personality disorder.

Authors:  Marijn Lijffijt; F Gerard Moeller; Nash N Boutros; S Burroughs; Joel L Steinberg; Scott D Lane; Alan C Swann
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.198

9.  GABA predicts inhibition of frequency-specific oscillations in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Laura M Rowland; Richard A E Edden; Kimberly Kontson; He Zhu; Peter B Barker; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.198

10.  P50: A candidate ERP biomarker of prodromal Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Deborah L Green; Lisa Payne; Robi Polikar; Paul J Moberg; David A Wolk; John Kounios
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.