BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: To compare the t-scores of proximal femur and lumbar spine of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) with different levels of weight bearing. METHODS: Cross-sectional study comparing 3 groups of patients with SCI: patients with daily standing times of more than 1 hour, patients with daily standing times of less than 1 hour, and nonstanding patients. Seventy-one patients with chronic SCI were recruited. They were assigned to 1 of 3 groups according to their reported daily standing time. The bone density of lumbar and proximal femoral regions was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The 3 groups were similar in terms of demographics and clinical variables. No significant difference was found among the mean t-scores of lumbar and proximal femoral regions of the groups. However, the patients in the group that stood more than 1 hour daily had a slight tendency to have higher t-scores than those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference among the 3 groups. However, standing might be partially helpful in protecting the bone density in SCI by opposing the effects of immobilization.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: To compare the t-scores of proximal femur and lumbar spine of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) with different levels of weight bearing. METHODS: Cross-sectional study comparing 3 groups of patients with SCI: patients with daily standing times of more than 1 hour, patients with daily standing times of less than 1 hour, and nonstanding patients. Seventy-one patients with chronic SCI were recruited. They were assigned to 1 of 3 groups according to their reported daily standing time. The bone density of lumbar and proximal femoral regions was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: The 3 groups were similar in terms of demographics and clinical variables. No significant difference was found among the mean t-scores of lumbar and proximal femoral regions of the groups. However, the patients in the group that stood more than 1 hour daily had a slight tendency to have higher t-scores than those in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference among the 3 groups. However, standing might be partially helpful in protecting the bone density in SCI by opposing the effects of immobilization.
Authors: L M Giangregorio; A L Hicks; C E Webber; S M Phillips; B C Craven; J M Bugaresti; N McCartney Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Lewis W Chan; Tomas L Griebling; Edwin P Arnold; Peggy S Chu; Peter W New; Adrian Wagg Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Nour Zleik; Frances Weaver; Robert L Harmon; Brian Le; Reshmitha Radhakrishnan; Wanda D Jirau-Rosaly; B Catharine Craven; Mattie Raiford; Jennifer N Hill; Bella Etingen; Marylou Guihan; Michael H Heggeness; Cara Ray; Laura Carbone Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Jessica A Inskip; Henrike Rianne J C Ravensbergen; Inderjeet S Sahota; Christine Zawadzki; Lowell T McPhail; Jaimie F Borisoff; Victoria E Claydon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 3.240