Literature DB >> 8643298

Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children.

T Balkany1, A V Hodges, K W Goodman.   

Abstract

Certain leaders of the Deaf community are attempting to generate opposition to cochlear implants in children by pitting the rights of deaf children and their families against the needs of deaf society. They have labeled physicians as unethical and CIs as "child abuse," resulting in misunderstanding, anger, and violence. However, the arguments of these leaders are internally contradictory: they hold that deafness is not a disability but support disability benefits for the deaf; they maintain both that cochlear implants do not work and that they work so well that they are "genocidal" (i.e., they will eliminate deafness). Their positions oppose the ethical principles of beneficence and autonomy as they relate to self-determination and privacy. Ethical standards hold that the best interests of the child precede those of a special interest group and that parents have the responsibility to determine their children's best interests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8643298     DOI: 10.1016/S0194-59989670097-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   5.591


  7 in total

1.  Implant ethics.

Authors:  S O Hansson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  R Nunes
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-08

3.  Hear Me Out: Cochlear Implantation Within an Increasingly Connected and Cosmopolitan World.

Authors:  Joshua M Sappington
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec

4.  Enhancement technology and outcomes: what professionals and researchers can learn from those skeptical about cochlear implants.

Authors:  Patrick Kermit
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-12

5.  Cochlear Implantation, Enhancements, Transhumanism and Posthumanism: Some Human Questions.

Authors:  Joseph Lee
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  The right not to hear: the ethics of parental refusal of hearing rehabilitation.

Authors:  Serena Byrd; Andrew G Shuman; Sharon Kileny; Paul R Kileny
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 7.  The cochlear implant: historical aspects and future prospects.

Authors:  Adrien A Eshraghi; Ronen Nazarian; Fred F Telischi; Suhrud M Rajguru; Eric Truy; Chhavi Gupta
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.064

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.