Literature DB >> 8641490

Comparisons of pregnancy loss patterns after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and other assisted reproductive technologies.

C B Coulam1, M S Opsahl, R J Sherins, L P Thorsell, A Dorfmann, L Krysa, E Fugger, J D Schulman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome of pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with those of other assisted reproductive technologies.
DESIGN: Pregnancy outcomes after ICSI were followed prospectively and compared with pregnancy outcomes after IVF with fresh and frozen ETs and donor oocyte cycles.
SETTING: A private tertiary referral center for genetics and infertility in Fairfax, Virginia. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-six couples achieving pregnancy after undergoing ICSI, 71 after IVF, 35 donor oocyte recipients, and 19 after transfer of frozen-thawed embryos.
INTERVENTIONS: In vitro fertilization and/or ET for all couples. Dilatation and curettage to obtain products of conception for chromosome analysis in 28 women experiencing spontaneous abortion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy outcomes were classified as preclinical loss, clinical loss, and ongoing pregnancy.
RESULTS: The mean frequency of preclinical pregnancy loss was 26% after ICSI, 28% after IVF, 3% after ET using donor oocytes, and 11% after frozen ET. The rate of clinical loss after ICSI (21%) was compared with IVF (18%), donor oocyte cycles (11%), and frozen ETs (21%).
CONCLUSIONS: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not associated with an increase in pregnancy losses, clinical or preclinical, compared with conventional IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8641490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection increases embryo fragmentation without affecting clinical outcome.

Authors:  J L Frattarelli; M P Leondires; B T Miller; J H Segars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  What is a preclinical pregnancy loss?

Authors:  C B Coulam; C Chapman; J S Rinehart
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Subclinical pregnancy losses among women undergoing in-vitro fertilization with ICSI.

Authors:  Ulun Ulug; Suleyman Tosun; Esra Aksoy Jozwiak; Ali Mesut; Alper Sismanoglu; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Outcome of pregnancies derived from assisted reproductive technologies: IVF versus ICSI.

Authors:  R Orvieto; Z Ben-Rafael; J Ashkenazi; R Yoeli; B Messing; T Perri; Y Shalev; I Bar-Hava
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  In vitro fertilization in Japan - early days of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer and future prospects for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Masakuni Suzuki
Journal:  Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.493

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.