Literature DB >> 11077619

Outcome of pregnancies derived from assisted reproductive technologies: IVF versus ICSI.

R Orvieto1, Z Ben-Rafael, J Ashkenazi, R Yoeli, B Messing, T Perri, Y Shalev, I Bar-Hava.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the course and outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) pregnancies.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in a university-affiliated IVF unit with 200 patients who conceived in 1996-1997, 100 with ICSI and 100 with IVF. Data were retrieved from our prospectively created computerized database. In addition, all patients were interviewed by telephone, and the interviewing physician completed a detailed questionnaire. Findings for the IVF and ICSI pregnancies were compared. The main outcome measures were maternal age, implantation rate, early pregnancy complications, clinical abortion rate, multiple pregnancy delivery rate, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, and birth weight.
RESULTS: In all, 238 children were born, including 104 singleton infants (45 IVF, 59 ICSI), 49 twin pairs (28 IVF, 21 ICSI), and 12 triplet sets (3 IVF, 9 ICSI). Statistically significant differences between the ICSI and IVF groups were noted for maternal age (31.3 +/- 4.4 vs. 33.4 +/- 4.8, respectively, P < 0.005) and clinical abortion rate (11% vs. 24%, respectively, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: ICSI pregnancies in our series were characterized by a lower clinical abortion rate than IVF pregnancies, probably because of the mean younger age of the ICSI group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11077619      PMCID: PMC3489414          DOI: 10.1023/a:1009497809176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  8 in total

1.  Morphology and clinical outcomes of embryos after in vitro fertilization are superior to those after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  I Bar-Hava; J Ashkenazi; M Shelef; A Schwartz; M Brengauz; D Feldberg; R Orvieto; Z Ben-Rafael
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Comparison of pregnancy outcome after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  I Govaerts; F Devreker; I Koenig; I Place; M Van den Bergh; Y Englert
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Chromosomal analysis of human oocytes fertilized by microinjection of spermatozoa into the perivitelline space.

Authors:  I Kola; O Lacham; R P Jansen; M Turner; A Trounson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Evolution of pregnancies and initial follow-up of newborns delivered after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  G D Palermo; L T Colombero; G L Schattman; O K Davis; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Report on the activities of the ESHRE Task Force on intracytoplasmic sperm injection. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Authors:  B C Tarlatzis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Comparisons of pregnancy loss patterns after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and other assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  C B Coulam; M S Opsahl; R J Sherins; L P Thorsell; A Dorfmann; L Krysa; E Fugger; J D Schulman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Incidence of numerical chromosome anomalies in human pregnancy estimation from induced and spontaneous abortion data.

Authors:  P S Burgoyne; K Holland; R Stephens
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a powerful tool to overcome fertilization failure.

Authors:  G D Palermo; J Cohen; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.329

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Subclinical pregnancy losses among women undergoing in-vitro fertilization with ICSI.

Authors:  Ulun Ulug; Suleyman Tosun; Esra Aksoy Jozwiak; Ali Mesut; Alper Sismanoglu; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first trimester pregnancy loss: A logistic model.

Authors:  Laura Detti; Ludwig Francillon; Mary E Christiansen; Irene Peregrin-Alvarez; Patricia J Goeske; Zoran Bursac; Robert A Roman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Automated prediction of early spontaneous miscarriage based on the analyzing ultrasonographic gestational sac imaging by the convolutional neural network: a case-control and cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Qixin Zhang; Chenghuan Yin; Lizhu Chen; Zeyu Yang; Shanshan Jia; Xue Sun; Yuzuo Bai; Fangfang Han; Zhengwei Yuan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.105

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.