Literature DB >> 8641154

High resolution evoked potential imaging of the cortical dynamics of human working memory.

A Gevins1, M E Smith, J Le, H Leong, J Bennett, N Martin, L McEvoy, R Du, S Whitfield.   

Abstract

High resolution evoked potentials (EPs), sampled from 115 channels and spatially sharpened with the finite element deblurring method, were recorded from 8 subjects during working memory (WM) and control tasks. The tasks required matching each stimulus with a preceding stimulus on either verbal or spatial attributes. All stimuli elicited a central P200 potential that was larger in the spatial tasks than in the verbal tasks, and larger in the WM tasks than in the control tasks. Frequent, non-matching stimuli elicited a frontal, positive peak at 305 msec that was larger in the spatial WM task relative to the other tasks. Irrespective of whether subjects attended to verbal or spatial stimulus attributes, non-matching stimuli in the WM tasks also elicited an enhanced P450 potential over the left frontal cortex, followed by a sustained potential over the superior parietal cortex. A posterior P390 potential elicited by infrequent, matching stimuli was smaller in amplitude for both spatial and verbal WM tasks compared to control tasks, as was a central prestimulus CNV. These results indicate that WM is a function of a distributed system with both task-specific and task-independent components. Lesion studies and course temporal resolution functional imaging methods, such as PET and fMRI, tend to paint a fairly static picture of the cortical regions which participate in the performance of WM tasks. In contrast, the fine-grain time resolution provided by imaging brain function with EP methods provides a dynamic picture of subsecond changes in the spatial distribution of WM effects over the course of individual trials, as well as evidence for differences in the activity elicited by matching and non-matching stimuli within sequences of trials. This information about the temporal dynamics of WM provides a critical complement to the fine-grain spatial resolution provided by other imaging modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8641154     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)00288-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  38 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic imaging of higher brain function.

Authors:  A Gevins; M E Smith; L K McEvoy; H Leong; J Le
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Frontal-lobe involvement in spatial memory: evidence from PET, fMRI, and lesion studies.

Authors:  R P Kessels; A Postma; E M Wijnalda; E H de Haan
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Mechanisms underlying age- and performance-related differences in working memory.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Hyemi Chong; Xue Sun; Elise C Tarbi; Jenna L Riis; Scott M McGinnis; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: I. cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson; Seppo P Ahlfors; Clifford D Saron
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The electrocortical modulation effects of different emotion regulation strategies.

Authors:  Shuzhen Gan; Jianfeng Yang; Xuhai Chen; Yufang Yang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Attentional responses on an auditory oddball predict false memory susceptibility.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Dianna Long; Robert F Belli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  The impact of moderate sleep loss on neurophysiologic signals during working-memory task performance.

Authors:  Michael E Smith; Linda K McEvoy; Alan Gevins
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Predictive smooth eye pursuit in a population of young men: I. Effects of age, IQ, oculomotor and cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Emmanouil Kattoulas; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Nicholas C Stefanis; Dimitrios Avramopoulos; Costas N Stefanis; Ioannis Evdokimidis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Distress intolerance modulation of neurophysiological markers of cognitive control during a complex go/no-go task.

Authors:  Richard J Macatee; Brian J Albanese; Kevin Clancy; Nicholas P Allan; Edward M Bernat; Jesse R Cougle; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2018-01

10.  Neural correlates of task and source switching: similar or different?

Authors:  Iroise Dumontheil; Sam J Gilbert; Paul W Burgess; Leun J Otten
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.