Literature DB >> 8638993

Cancer screening and informed patient discussions. Truth and consequences.

A M Wolf1, D M Becker.   

Abstract

While screening for asymptomatic cancer has become one of the principal clinical activities of primary care physicians, patients are generally not involved directly in screening decisions. To help physicians better communicate the potential benefits and burdens of cancer screening, this article concisely presents information necessary for patients to make a reasoned decision as to whether to proceed with screening: the probability of developing cancer, the operating characteristics of available screening tests, the likelihood that screening will result in an improved outcome for the individual patient, and the potential burdens associated with screening. Screening tests for breast, colorectal, cervical, and prostate cancers are reviewed, including mammography, clinical breast examination, fecal occult blood testing, Papanicolaou smear, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen. Better communication about cancer screening will promote shared decision making--a central tenet of the physician-patient relationship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8638993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  8 in total

1.  Patient-provider communication in cancer screening.

Authors:  Tung T Nguyen; Stephen J McPhee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Decision making and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Radhika A Ramanan; Ellen P McCarthy; Edward R Marcantonio
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Discussions about prostate cancer screening between U.S. primary care physicians and their patients.

Authors:  Ingrid J Hall; Yhenneko J Taylor; Louie E Ross; Lisa C Richardson; Thomas B Richards; Sun Hee Rim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Misconceptions about efficacy of mammography screening: a public health dilemma.

Authors:  E Chamot; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests.

Authors:  A S Dunn; K V Shridharani; W Lou; J Bernstein; C R Horowitz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Preferences for human papillomavirus testing with routine cervical cancer screening in diverse older women.

Authors:  Alison J Huang; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Sue E Kim; Sabrina T Wong; Celia P Kaplan; Judith M E Walsh; A Yuri Iwaoka-Scott; George F Sawaya
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  A targeted decision aid for the elderly to decide whether to undergo colorectal cancer screening: development and results of an uncontrolled trial.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Carol E Golin; Chris DeLeon; Jennifer M Griffith; Jena Ivey; Lyndal Trevena; Michael Pignone
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  US Primary Care Physicians' Prostate Cancer Screening Practices: A Vignette-Based Analysis of Screening Men at High Risk.

Authors:  Sun Hee Rim; Ingrid J Hall; Thomas B Richards; Trevor D Thompson; Lisa C Richardson; Louie E Ross; Marcus Plescia
Journal:  Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.