Literature DB >> 8637340

Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group.

B Gärdlund1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fatal pulmonary embolism and other thromboembolic complications are common in hospital inpatients. However, there is little evidence on the routine use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in non-surgical patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose heparin in the prevention of hospital-acquired, clinically relevant, fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases.
METHODS: Our study used the postrandomisation consent design. 19,751 consecutive patients, aged 55 years or older, admitted to departments of infectious diseases in six Swedish hospitals, were screened for inclusion in the randomised, controlled, unblinded, multicentre trial. Of the eligible patients, 5776 were assigned subcutaneous standard heparin (5000 IU every 12 h) until hospital discharge or for a maximum of 3 weeks; 5917 were assigned no prophylactic treatment (control group). We sought consent only from the heparin group. Follow-up was for 3 weeks after discharge from hospital or for a maximum of 60 days from randomisation. The primary endpoint was necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism of predefined clinical relevance.
FINDINGS: By intention-to-treat analysis mortality was similar in the heparin and control groups (5.3 vs 5.6%, p = 0.39) and the median time from admission to death was 16 days in both groups (IQR 8-31 vs 6-28 days). Necropsy-verified pulmonary embolism occurred in 15 heparin-treated and 16 control-group patients. There was a significant difference between heparin and control groups in median time from randomisation to fatal pulmonary embolism (28 [24-36] vs 12.5 [10-20] days, p = 0.007). This difference corresponds to the duration of heparin prophylaxis. Non-fatal thromboembolic complications occurred in more of the control than of the heparin group (116 vs 70, p = 0.0012).
INTERPRETATION: Our findings do not support the routine use of heparin prophylaxis for 3 weeks or less in large groups of non-surgical patients. Further studies are needed to investigate whether heparin prophylaxis of longer duration may prevent fatal pulmonary embolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8637340     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91009-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  35 in total

Review 1.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin in the hospitalized medical patient: the case for thrice daily over twice daily dosing.

Authors:  Charles E Mahan; Mario Pini; Alex C Spyropoulos
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  Risk-assessment algorithm and recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical patients.

Authors:  Ana T Rocha; Edison F Paiva; Arnaldo Lichtenstein; Rodolfo Milani; Cyrillo Filho Cavalheiro; Francisco H Maffei
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007

Review 3.  The venous thrombotic risk in nonsurgical patients.

Authors:  J Bouthier
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Thrombotic Risk and Covid-19: Review of Current Evidence for a Better Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Raquel López-Reyes; Grace Oscullo; David Jiménez; Irene Cano; Alberto García-Ortega
Journal:  Arch Bronconeumol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients: a clinical update.

Authors:  Alexander G G Turpie; Alain Leizorovicz
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Implementation and evaluation of a pharmacy-led thromboprophylaxis campaign in a community hospital.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Bernier; Karine Desjardins; Josée Filiatrault; Marc-André Sauriol; Josée Martineau; Edith Gilbert; Stéphanie Caron; Lyne Lalonde
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 7.  Venous thromboembolism and cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Celso Arrais Rodrigues; Renata Ferrarotto; Roberto Kalil Filho; Yana A S Novis; Paulo M G Hoff
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Management and prevention of venous thromboembolism including surgery and the pregnant state.

Authors:  Steven B Deitelzweig
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2002

9.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Mary Cushman; Allison E Burnett; Susan R Kahn; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Frederick A Spencer; Suely M Rezende; Neil A Zakai; Kenneth A Bauer; Francesco Dentali; Jill Lansing; Sara Balduzzi; Andrea Darzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Ignacio Neumann; Robby Nieuwlaat; Juan J Yepes-Nuñez; Yuan Zhang; Wojtek Wiercioch
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

10.  Agreement of four competing guidelines on prevention of venous thromboembolism and comparison with observed physician practices: a cross-sectional study of 1,032 medical inpatients.

Authors:  José Labarère; Jean-Luc Bosson; Jean-François Bergmann; Nathalie Thilly
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.