Literature DB >> 8637210

Comparative analysis of imaging modalities in the preoperative assessment of nodal metastasis in esophageal cancer.

R Y Chandawarkar1, T Kakegawa, H Fujita, H Yamana, N Hayabuthi.   

Abstract

Preoperative radiological findings of nodal status in 74 patients, using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were compared to histopathology reports following transthoracic total esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy (TTE), involving complete dissection of the mediastinal and abdominal nodes and lower cervical lymph nodes. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each radiological investigation were calculated for each anatomic group of nodes. Statistical analysis revealed that EUS is more accurate and significantly more sensitive (P<0.01) for lymph nodes along the right recurrent laryngeal nerve and those in the upper and mid-periesophageal, infracarinal locations. Paratracheal and lower paraesophageal nodes are assessed better using CT whereas MRI is better for mid-paraesophageal and infra-aortic nodes. US is most accurate and sensitive for evaluation of cervical and abdominal nodes (P<0.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8637210     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199603)61:3<214::AID-JSO10>3.0.CO;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  7 in total

1.  The role of integrated F-18-FDG-PET scanning in the detection of M1 disease in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and impact on clinical management.

Authors:  Soumil Vyas; Sheraz R Markar; Lydia Iordanidou; Samantha Read; David Stoker; Majid Hashemi; Ian Mitchell; Mark Winslet; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Preoperative TN staging of esophageal cancer: comparison of miniprobe ultrasonography, spiral CT and MRI.

Authors:  Ling-Fei Wu; Bing-Zhou Wang; Jia-Lin Feng; Wei-Rong Cheng; Guo-Re Liu; Xiao-Hua Xu; Zhi-Chao Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A study comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) in staging oesophageal cancer and their role in clinical decision making.

Authors:  Duminda Subasinghe; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2010-03

Review 4.  Pneumo-CT assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer: Imaging-pathological correlation.

Authors:  Marina Ulla; Ernestina Gentile; Ezequiel Levy Yeyati; Maria L Diez; Demetrio Cavadas; Ricardo D Garcia-Monaco; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-12-15

Review 5.  Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastasis of head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Sun; B Li; C J Li; Y Li; F Su; Q H Gao; F L Wu; T Yu; L Wu; L J Li
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Detection of lymph node metastases with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oesophageal cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  B B Pultrum; E J van der Jagt; H L van Westreenen; H M van Dullemen; P Kappert; H Groen; J Sietsma; M Oudkerk; J Th M Plukker; G M van Dam
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Detection of distant metastases in patients with oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer: a diagnostic decision analysis.

Authors:  E P M van Vliet; E W Steyerberg; M J C Eijkemans; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.