Literature DB >> 8636370

The individual responsiveness to growth hormone (GH) treatment in GH-deficient adults is dependent on the level of GH-binding protein, body mass index, age, and gender.

G Johannsson1, R Bjarnason, M Bramnert, L M Carlsson, M Degerblad, P Manhem, T Rośen, M Thorén, B A Bengtsson.   

Abstract

The aim of the present trial was to study the individual responsiveness to GH treatment in terms of body composition and to search for possible predictors of the response in GH-deficient adults. Sixty-eight patients (44 men and 24 women) with a mean age of 44.3 (1.2) yr and verified GH deficiency participated in a 2-phase treatment trial with an initial randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month period, followed by an open treatment period, thereby ensuring all patients 12 months of GH treatment. Recombinant human GH was administered sc daily at bedtime, with a target dose of 12 micrograms/kg x day. GHBP was measured by ligand-mediated immunofunctional assay, and serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was determined by RIA after acid-ethanol extraction, using a truncated IGF-I analog as the radioligand. Lean body mass (LBM) and body fat (BF) were determined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and total body water (TBW) was determined by bioelectrical impedance. During the placebo control period, serum IGF-I,LBM, and TBW increased (P < 0.001), whereas BF decreased (P < 0.001) and serum GHBP was unchanged in the group treated with GH compared with the patients treated with placebo. After 12 months of GH treatment, the individual changes in BF ranged from -12.5 to 4.3 kg and from -4.5 to 10.1 kg in LBM. Age (P < 0.05) and baseline GHBP level (P < 0.01) were inversely correlated with the increase in LBM. The GH-induced increment in IGF-I and TBW was greater in men than in women (P < 0.01), whereas the decreases in BF were similar in men and women. This trial demonstrates the variability in responsiveness to GH administration in GH-deficient adults. The best response to GH was obtained in younger patients with low GHBP levels. Furthermore, men responded better than women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8636370     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.81.4.8636370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  14 in total

Review 1.  Long-term growth hormone replacement therapy in hypopituitary adults.

Authors:  Johan Verhelst; Roger Abs
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Intersubject responsiveness of high-affinity growth hormone (GH)-binding protein (GHBP) to long-term GH replacement therapy.

Authors:  W R De Vries; H P Koppeschaar; E Bol; C A Roelen; G H Donker; M E Doerga; M Osman-Dualeh; Y E Snel
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Gender and age in the biochemical assessment of cure of acromegaly.

Authors:  P U Freda; R E Landman; R E Sundeen; K D Post
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  [Growth hormone therapy in adults. Attempt to assess a decade of use].

Authors:  M Faust; C J Strasburger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Provincial disparities of growth hormone coverage for young adult survivors of paediatric brain tumours across Canada.

Authors:  Haroon Hasan; Fuchsia Howard; Steven G Morgan; Daniel L Metzger; Andrea C Lo; Karen Goddard; Sabrina Gill; Michelle Johnson
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-02

Review 6.  Does the GH/IGF-1 axis contribute to skeletal sexual dimorphism? Evidence from mouse studies.

Authors:  Zhongbo Liu; Subburaman Mohan; Shoshana Yakar
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.372

7.  Favorable Impacts of Growth Hormone (GH) Replacement Therapy on Atherogenic Risks in Japanese Children with GH Deficiency.

Authors:  Hitoshi Kohno; Toshiaki Tanaka; Kenji Fujieda; Kazuo Chihara; Yoshiki Seino; Minoru Irie; Kazue Takano
Journal:  Clin Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2012-03-24

8.  Approach to the evaluation of the GH/IGF-axis in patients with pituitary disease: which test to order.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Laurence Katznelson
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Growth Hormone Research Society perspective on the development of long-acting growth hormone preparations.

Authors:  Jens Sandahl Christiansen; Philippe F Backeljauw; Martin Bidlingmaier; Beverly M K Biller; Margaret C S Boguszewski; Felipe F Casanueva; Philippe Chanson; Pierre Chatelain; Catherine S Choong; David R Clemmons; Laurie E Cohen; Pinchas Cohen; Jan Frystyk; Adda Grimberg; Yukihiro Hasegawa; Morey W Haymond; Ken Ho; Andrew R Hoffman; Jeff M P Holly; Reiko Horikawa; Charlotte Höybye; Jens Otto L Jorgensen; Gudmundur Johannsson; Anders Juul; Laurence Katznelson; John J Kopchick; K O Lee; Kuk-Wha Lee; Xiaoping Luo; Shlomo Melmed; Bradley S Miller; Madhusmita Misra; Vera Popovic; Ron G Rosenfeld; Judith Ross; Richard J Ross; Paul Saenger; Christian J Strasburger; Michael O Thorner; Haim Werner; Kevin Yuen
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 10.  Individual sensitivity to growth hormone replacement in adults.

Authors:  Cesar Luiz Boguszewski
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 6.514

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.