Literature DB >> 8636183

Survivorship analysis of the Kinematic Stabilizer total knee replacement: a 10- to 14-year follow-up.

K P Emmerson1, C G Moran, I M Pinder.   

Abstract

The Kinematic Stabilizer is a posterior-cruciate-substituting design of total knee replacement. We have reviewed 109 primary total knee replacements in 95 patients at a mean follow-up time of 12.7 years (10 to 14). We used survival analysis with failure defined as revision of the implant. This gave a cumulative survival rate of 95% (95% CI +/- 5%) at ten years and (87% +/- 10%) at 13 years. These results from an independent centre confirm the value of an established design of cemented total knee replacement and question the wisdom of the introduction of modifications and new designs without properly controlled trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8636183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  21 in total

1.  Total knee replacement: the joint of the decade. A successful operation, for which there's a large unmet need.

Authors:  C G Moran; T C Horton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-25

2.  Early revision for isolated internal malrotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Pietsch; Siegfried Hofmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Ten-year survival analysis of the PFC total knee arthroplasty--a surgeon's first 99 replacements.

Authors:  Alasdair J A Santini; Videsh Raut
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Which primary total knee replacement? A review of currently available TKR in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Y Liow; D W Murray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Association between anteroposterior laxity in mid-range flexion and subjective healing of instability after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoharu Mochizuki; Osamu Tanifuji; Takashi Sato; Hiroki Hijikata; Hiroshi Koga; Satoshi Watanabe; Yukimasa Higano; Akihiro Ariumi; Takayuki Murayama; Hiroshi Yamagiwa; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Increased patellofemoral pressure after TKA: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Ulf G Leichtle; Markus Wünschel; Carmen I Leichtle; Otto Müller; Philipp Kohler; Nikolaus Wülker; Andrea Lorenz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner?

Authors:  Matthew C Lyons; Steven J MacDonald; Lyndsay E Somerville; Douglas D Naudie; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Changes in hindfoot alignment after total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritic patients with varus deformity.

Authors:  Woo-Shin Cho; Hun-Sik Cho; Seong-Eun Byun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Hyung-Mook Lim; Eun-Soo Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.