Literature DB >> 863235

The effect of combining alleles into electrophoretic classes on detecting linkage disequilibrium.

E Zouros, G B Golding, T F MacKay.   

Abstract

When alleles are combined into few detectable classes, linkage correlations are underestimated most of the time. The probability that the linkage correlation will be underestimated is a function of the actual degree of correlation and the evenness of the allelic distribution, but is mainly determined by the distribution of alleles into distinguishable classes. With only two alleles per class this probability will usually be higher than 0.7. Also, the consistency in the sign of the linkage disequilibrium over many populations may escape detection. An increase of sample size by one order of magnitude or more may be required to compensate for the loss in detection power. It follows that the available electrophoretic studies of linkage correlations, although negative in their majority, do not suggest that epistatic interactions and linkage disequilibria are rare in natural populations.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 863235      PMCID: PMC1224587     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  3 in total

Review 1.  Population genetics.

Authors:  R C Lewontin
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XII. Linkage disequilibrium in a large local population.

Authors:  T Muki; T K Watanabe; O Yamaguchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Linkage disequilibrium in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C H Langley; Y N Tobari; K I Kojima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 4.562

  3 in total
  13 in total

1.  Transmission/disequilibrium tests using multiple tightly linked markers.

Authors:  H Zhao; S Zhang; K R Merikangas; M Trixler; D B Wildenauer; F Sun; K K Kidd
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-08-31       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Testing Hypotheses about Linkage Disequilibrium with Multiple Alleles.

Authors:  B S Weir; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Toward localization of the Werner syndrome gene by linkage disequilibrium and ancestral haplotyping: lessons learned from analysis of 35 chromosome 8p11.1-21.1 markers.

Authors:  K A Goddard; C E Yu; J Oshima; T Miki; J Nakura; C Piussan; G M Martin; G D Schellenberg; E M Wijsman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The effect of marker heterozygosity on the power to detect linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  J Ott; D Rabinowitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Clonality of multidrug-resistant nontypeable strains of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  M C Fusté; M A Pineda; J Palomar; M Viñas; J G Lorén
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Linkage disequilibria between pairs of loci within a highly polymorphic region of chromosome 2Q.

Authors:  M Litt; L B Jorde
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A Study of Linkage Disequilibrium in British Populations of DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth; M Loukas
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The Genetics of DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA Populations. Xiv. Further Data on Linkage Disequilibria.

Authors:  M Loukas; C B Krimbas; K Morgan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Linkage disequilibrium and extended haplotypes in the HLA-A to D6S105 region: implications for mapping the hemochromatosis gene (HFE).

Authors:  G Gandon; A M Jouanolle; B Chauvel; V Mauvieux; A le Treut; J Feingold; J Y Le Gall; V David; J Yaouanq
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Gametic equilibrium of four loci on chromosome 1.

Authors:  K Gottlieb
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.