Literature DB >> 8632315

Characterization of the antinociceptive properties of cimetidine and a structural analog.

B Y Li1, J W Nalwalk, L A Barker, P Cumming, M E Parsons, L B Hough.   

Abstract

The antinociceptive and pharmacological properties of the H2 receptor antagonist cimetidine and a novel cimetidine analog, SKF92374, were characterized. On both the hot-plate and tail-flick nociceptive tests, cimetidine and SKF92374 induced complete, dose-related analgesic responses when injected into the lateral ventricle of rats. SKF92374 showed strong similarities to cimetidine in analgesic efficacy, slope of dose-response curves and chemical structure, suggesting that these compounds share a common analgesic mechanism. In contrast, histamine induced submaximal antinociceptive effects, and the H3 antagonist thioperamide, a known HA-releasing drug, had little or no analgesic effects. Compared with cimetidine, SKF92374 showed very weak activity (400-fold lower affinity) on H2 receptors in vitro (isolated guinea pig atrium) and in vivo (rat gastric secretion). In addition, SKF92374 (100 microM) had neither agonist nor antagonist action on guinea pig ileum H1 receptors. SKF92374 was also a weak competitive antagonist of N alpha-methylhistamine-induced inhibition of electrically induced contractions of the guinea pig ileum (Kd = 5.2 microM), an H3 receptor-mediated response. Autoradiographic binding assays in guinea pig brain confirmed a weak antagonism of H3 receptors by SKF92374. The compound (up to 10 microM) also had no effect on unpurified rat brain histamine N-methyltransferase activity. These results support the hypothesis that cimetidine induces analgesia by a novel brain mechanism unrelated to H1, H2 or H3 receptors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8632315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  8 in total

1.  Neural basis for improgan antinociception.

Authors:  M M Heinricher; M E Martenson; J W Nalwalk; L B Hough
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Antinociceptive activity of CC44, a biotinylated improgan congener.

Authors:  Paul Hoerbelt; Julia W Nalwalk; James G Phillips; Mark P Wentland; Zhixing Shan; Lindsay B Hough
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.432

Review 3.  H3 receptors and pain modulation: peripheral, spinal, and brain interactions.

Authors:  Lindsay B Hough; Frank L Rice
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Improgan-induced hypothermia: a role for cannabinoid receptors in improgan-induced changes in nociceptive threshold and body temperature.

Authors:  Catherine L Salussolia; Julia W Nalwalk; Lindsay B Hough
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  CC12, a high-affinity ligand for [3H]cimetidine binding, is an improgan antagonist.

Authors:  Lindsay B Hough; Julia W Nalwalk; James G Phillips; Brian Kern; Zhixing Shan; Mark P Wentland; Iwan J P de Esch; Elwin Janssen; Travis Barr; Rebecca Stadel
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Inhibition of brain [(3)H]cimetidine binding by improgan-like antinociceptive drugs.

Authors:  Rebecca Stadel; Amanda B Carpenter; Julia W Nalwalk; Iwan J P de Esch; Elwin Janssen; Lindsay B Hough
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  Antinociceptive activity of furan-containing congeners of improgan and ranitidine.

Authors:  L B Hough; W M P B Menge; A C van de Stolpe; J W Nalwalk; R Leurs; I J P de Esch
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Non-opioid antinociception produced by brain stem injections of improgan: significance of local, but not cross-regional, cannabinoid mechanisms.

Authors:  Lindsay B Hough; Konstantina Svokos; Julia W Nalwalk
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.252

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.